I would like to introduce a few important facts to the Sandia Phantom jetfighter videos and pictures of a jet plus 2 engines impacting a solid
concrete block. A few very important details have been left out in the former discussion of these videos.
www.iaea.org...
Full-scale aircraft impact test.
An F-4D PHANTOM aircraft. Impact velocity 774 km/h. Conducted at SANDIA National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 19 April 1988. Funded by
MUTO INSTITUTE OF STRUCTURAL MECHANICS Inc., Tokyo, Japan..
"The Target” – reinforced concrete block 7 m x 7 m x 3.66 m ( thick). Weight: 469 Ton.
Aircraft was completely destroyed, target face had superficial damage, with
penetration depth of 60 mm in the engine region and
20 mm in the
fuselage region.
--- Target displacement 1,88 m. ---
That means the F-4D Phantom jetfighter impact MOVED 469 tons of solid concrete a distance of 1,88 meter !
Which means that the displacement trajectory of the target block absorbed most of the impact energy.
In this link one can find some extra views :
www.iaea.org...
Side view of the target at the moment of collision.
Front view of the target after collision.
This is the site where you can download the 2 films described in the above 2 links :
www.iaea.org...
And this is the most interesting discussion about the impact effects of a large passenger airliner on a reinforced concrete structure.
www.safesecurevital.org...
The MUTO Institute did not finance the logical second test at Sandia, of a jet impact on a rigid concrete block, probably because they knew already
what the predictable outcome would be. They did not want to spend their money on an unwanted test within the circles of nuclear power plants
constructors.
(Exerpt : At Sandia, a spokesman, John German, said the point of the test was to move the wall, as a way to measure the impact forces. The test was
sponsored by the Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics Inc., of Tokyo, as a preliminary step in building a computer model of such impacts, but the
Japanese decided not to sponsor the next step, Mr. German said.)
In fact the impact at the Pentagon on 11 September 2001 proofed the never performed, but most important second Sandia test, if you believe a 757 hit
the Pentagon.
Then a passenger airliner penetrated a reinforced concrete building surface.
How strange however, that the fuselage entry point consisted of a 2 windows wide opening, with a still standing collumn in the middle, and both the 2
engine holes beside it, are not to be found.
Don't forget also that in fact the most rigid part of the "plane" consists of 2 engines, with the strongest part of the plane inbetween them, being
the 2 wing connections to the fuselage and the 2 landing gear boxes with those 2 struts with the 4 wheels each.
It looks a bit like this : ------o=O=o------
You can't find anything resembling that strongest o=O=o imprint part of a 757 anywhere in the first pre-collapse pictures of the impacted Pentagon
wall on 9/11.
And as we know by now, the 2 engines should have made about a 3 times stronger impact as the fuselage, according to the Sandia test results.
And according to Howard Roarke, pieces of the front luggage loading-door rim can be seen laying outside the "punchout" hole in the C ring wall.
So those parts made it through the front wall and the whole 300 meter through 3 rings, but both the 2 engines plus engine cases did not.
Yup. Could be severe cases of the Patriotisimus Americanus "bird" Flu.