Originally posted by SkepticOverlord This topic continues to defy logic, even when logic has been clearly outlined.

Originally posted by slank Anyone with full color vision, eyes that can see, and a clear head, can see there is NO IDENTIFYABLE 757 IN THE PENTAGON'S OWN FOOTAGE. The only clearly identifyable shape in the pentagon's video is a white shape which looks remarkably like the camelback shape of a global hawk with what looks like the jet intake bulging out as it does on the global hawk. Isn't it AMAZING . . . On a clear and sunny day a light colored 757 with color stripes DISAPPEARS into the background while a white shape at the same depth is brilliantly white.

Originally posted by CatHerder I said, "Woah, is this true? I better look into this, this is too important to just accept until I know more." Deny Ignorance - educate yourself.

Originally posted by SpittinCobra

Originally posted by CatHerder I said, "Woah, is this true? I better look into this, this is too important to just accept until I know more." Deny Ignorance - educate yourself.

Why dont you try to find out why building 7 fell?

Originally posted by elevatedone there were no explosives used in building 7... None... I didnt say there was. two big buildings next to a smaller building fall down and nothing is supposed to happen to the smaller building... They where not that close. There where buildings closer that recived less damage.

Originally posted by CatHerder ...and before it hit this it hit a very heavy desil generator in front of the wall, and a steel steam vent pipe (each engine hit an object before the plane hit the wall - the starboard engine hit a very substantial object).

Originally posted by Nygdan

damned Who says whatever hit the building wasn’t custom built

Why would it be a different custom built plane?

Were the passengers really found and identified

Yes.

Why was the security video that was confiscated never released/shown

What difference does that make?

Witnesses that were close to the Pentagon are less likely to have seen much at all

Hence their inability to say what flight number it was, and the variance in size estimates. Also, some of the people were far enough away to see that it was a plane.

damned Wings shear off when planes enter holes,

At least you are stating reasons, unlike some of the jokers here. Infact, thats a perfectly sensible question, however, its addressed in the analysis links provided. From what I understand of it, upon impact, the thing was terrible smashed up , like CH said {well, paraphrased0 it acted like a liquid, and poured (in a sense) thru the holes. The wings weren't sheared off, and if that was the claim, you would expect there to be lots of wing on the lawn. But, in plane crashes, even regular ones, the bulk of the debris is often squished up in a lump beyond the impact site. Remeber, the item is traveling, with an incredible intertia, in a single direction.

Originally posted by SpittinCobra

Originally posted by CatHerder I said, "Woah, is this true? I better look into this, this is too important to just accept until I know more." Deny Ignorance - educate yourself.

Why dont you try to find out why building 7 fell?

Originally posted by SpittinCobra In the picture, above me of the gass station. It is apparent, there are alot of light poles in the way. My question is, Was anything besides the pentagon hit? Was the plane fling with landing gear down?

Originally posted by SpittinCobra In the picture, above me of the gass station. It is apparent, there are alot of light poles in the way. My question is, Was anything besides the pentagon hit? Was the plane fling with landing gear down?

Originally posted by Sauron

Originally posted by SpittinCobra In the picture, above me of the gass station. It is apparent, there are alot of light poles in the way. My question is, Was anything besides the pentagon hit? Was the plane fling with landing gear down?

I’m not a pilot but from what I understand IMO a jet can not lower it’s landing gear until it is moving slower, otherwise there is wind shear, I’m sure one of our local pilots could answer this for us, [edit on 16-9-2004 by Sauron]

Originally posted by CatHerder Does anyone read before replying anymore, or is it just "AH! Here is a thread! I won't read what this guy posted, but I'll tell him what I think anyway."

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by SpittinCobra Dont be a smart ass,

Excuse me? Don't presume to behave as board staff.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord [Several people appear to be reading small tidbits at best, or ignoring wide expanses of content at the worst.

Where can this info be found? Was there an investigation on this, too? I mean, it seems that we spent more time on TWA flight 800 than this, doesn't it? IMO, this is much more important.