The most serious error in the ASCE report can be found in section 3, "Review of Crash Information". Figure 3.3, a still frame from the unofficial,
yet released Pentagon security camera footage, incorrectly labels the white smoke trail in the still "Approaching Aircraft".
If the many building
performance experts on the panel who assembled the report cannot tell the difference between a white, bumpy smoke trail and a 757, their credibility
is questionable, at best.
If the Pros cant tell, How can you?
Smoke trail mislabled as 757.
Figure 3.4 clearly shows an extension of the same smoke trail reaching all the way to the Pentagon, which would make this "757" hundreds of feet
longer than a real 757. That is, of course, ignoring the fact that this supposed 757 lacks any wings, a tail, or any marking that would indicate it is
an airliner.
In fact, the ASCE report is the only place I have seen this bumpy, irregular smoke trail referred to as a 757. I believe this piece of
disinformation is deliberate.
If it is unintentional, then the ASCE should correct this report in order to save their credibility. There is nothing in the still frames that
remotely resembles a 757, so it is difficult to believe a team of engineers could make a mistake of this magnitude.
bedoper.com...
Riddle me this, If a 757 brought down the towers, why wasnt there more damage to the Pentagon?
The false-opposition 911 investigation sites are now bigger and louder than the real ones -- not created to get to the truth, but to manage people
away from the most critical conclusions which existing evidence already establishes. However, in your case they have failed, because you have found
this site.
Begin with the following quick overview of just two lines of conclusive evidence. Then follow the links for systematic presentations of all of the
independent proofs.
Proof One:
In the photo below, you see that when you match the image size of the killer jet's tail fin and that of the tail fin of a Boeing 757 and then overlay
the Boeing so that tail fins are aligned you find, as Richard Stanley and Jerry Russell demonstrate below, that the overlaid image of the Boeing
fuselage sticks out past the obstruction which completely conceals the image of the actual killer jet in the original picture. The killer jet,
therefore, has to be shorter and differently proportioned than the Boeing 757. This alone tells us Flight 77 was not the killer jet.
Proof Two:
Civil engineers have plotted to scale a Boeing 757 and the wall and supporting pillars of the Pentagon. The pillars are labeled by number. All are
agreed that the nose of the killer jet hit the Pentagon at pillar #14. But the question now becomes had the killer jet been a Boeing 757, as depicted
in this diagram, at which location in terms of pillars would the starboard engine have hit the building?
Overlay of Boeing 757 on the American Society of Civil Engineers Diagram by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins
Clearly, the starboard engine would have hit on the first floor at pillar #16.
Except that it didn't. Look below. Pillar #15 has been blasted near ground level (although if a Boeing had hit, the fuselage would have had to have
entered at the level of the ceiling of the first floor to allow for the engines which hang lower than the fuselage, BUT WHAT ABOUT PILLARS 16 AND 17?
bedoper.com...
It does match the shape and size of the engine
Wild physics i guess. Look at how 2 110 story buildings were pulverized to dust by pancaking trussels.
[edit on 15-9-2004 by project_pisces]