It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The whole thing is plausible at best but IMO still remains the better part of a Jules Vern story. .
Originally posted by humphreysjim
One reply in and already a failure to respond to the OP's question.
You will see this throughout the thread. There is no reason travel to the moon is impossible, so deniers will generally not answer the question and instead reply with personal reasons why they think the landing was faked.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by humphreysjim
One reply in and already a failure to respond to the OP's question.
You will see this throughout the thread. There is no reason travel to the moon is impossible, so deniers will generally not answer the question and instead reply with personal reasons why they think the landing was faked.
As to personal reasons why it isn't fake?!
While I agree with your statement I do no agree with your premise.
There has been a sudden uptick in posts claiming that the Apollo missions never landed on the Moon. The debate is mostly between two camps.
There's another group who think we have people on the moon now. A military moon base.
You'd have to convince me the Soyuz is capable. It might be able to send a small probe to the moon and back, but not a manned mission like Apollo, right?
Originally posted by DJW001
Is it even possible to send human beings to the Moon and return them safely to the Earth? ...
Allow me to begin. The logistics of sending human beings to the Moon is straightforward. All that is required is an off the shelf spacecraft; a Soyuz would do nicely.
dont we have (expensive) top notch equipment for regular joe nowadays which should spot the american flag on the moon? ..or dont we?
edit: im on the fence too....my 2 biggest issues are
a) the astronauts testemonies and especially the WAY they speak about it..
b.) it is against human nature that we do not have people there all the time if it worked once...even if there is "nothing"...
You'd have to convince me the Soyuz is capable. It might be able to send a small probe to the moon and back, but not a manned mission like Apollo, right?
You need a lot of fuel for the trans lunar injection, the moon landing, some fuel for the takeoff from the moon and more fuel for the return trip escaping the moon's gravity.
No. There are Three camps.
The third camp is that they heavily manipulated all the "public" missions.
WHY?
Your question: sending people to the Moon is possible, and even rest on for a long long period.
The biggest question would be "can we survive the radiation of passing the Van Allen Belt and beyond?" The second biggest question would then be "How much radiation do we need to protect our crafts and suits from?"
so, do you believe the "story" of how much radiation there would be?
Then you have the passing of the belt...again on the way back!
Then you've got, can you make the craft light enough, and the suits light enough to withstand said radiation.