This is real, unfortunately the force generated is too weak to push anything heavier than a 1kg weight. So no flying cars.

Btw, teleportation is pretty much impossible. The amount of energy, computing power, and space needed to do this would fill the solar system. Also, converting matter into energy is NOT a good idea. You'd turn the sloar system into a steaming pile of slag.

I couple of you have it right on target.

This tech is NOT new at all. It can't be called "anti-gravity" but there are multiple ways to levitate (so to speak) an object. Some of the recent topics being discussed here on ATS even give clues as to how. Even so, "how" is relative, as making something "float" wasn't so hard as finding a system that would keep it there, keep it cooled, keep it quiet, and above all else keep it within budget restrictions.

Some individuals here are tying these devices together with spaceships but, at least here in the USA, the United States Space Command group, and even the joint "Vision" "Master Plan" operating committees/associates really have had nothing to do with the development at all. Their R&D had been focused more on information gathering, protection, and "decay"/destruction technologies. Even the US Army & Air Force engineering groups have had to focus on more "immediate needs" like rapid airstrip deployment, weather and hydrology info gathering, geospatial, and most recently the DoD's HPCMP or "ezHCP" systems for continued supercomputer modernization.

A "floating" weapon has been on the back-burner no matter what people tell you. But the private sector groups have had this on their minds for a long time and after funneling through DARPA, works just fine. It's just going to be a long while until it's seen, and this is simply because right now a) it's just not that fast, and b) there is too much red tape to go through because certain people are paranoid to use it for Defensive purposes due to the possibility of capture and disassembly. What people see, or claim to have seen, I dismiss, but in terms of a manned vehicle? no. Radiation. EMP effects on ground monitoring stations(shielding being researched by the Army's ERDC group that was stated above too, actually..) The method I like the best uses an "element" that actually becomes lighter when heated. I don't mean convectors when I say this, I mean an actual material.

That's what I can/will share, and state now that despite the above mentioned information, I do not lay claim to authenticity nor responsibility in accordance with the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act for any of the above stated material if found to be incriminating.

The "problems" with the system I was referring to was in regards to what/how people generally think these craft work. Truth be told, the tech's been around since the 50's, and used where people could "see" it since the late 80's. Electrogravitics is not a new concept and while I can't say a hell of a lot due to non-disclosure signing, the truth is that "UFO" technology is really simple. Using general knowledge or ideas, people will note I said they are "too slow." This is the case, except when it's coupled with our propulsion systems these days, where it then hardly becomes an issue to accelerate to supersonic speeds. The real trick is not in how to make something work using "anti-gravity" technology, it's how to make it work in a manner that is undetected. That's where most time anymore is spent.