Great post OP!
MainLineThis, every one cares about this but you.
Just because UFO reports are old doesn't mean they are less reliable. In fact, it makes the evidence even more convincing because we had much less
technology back then. To have and object hover in one place and then suddenly shoot off faster then the speed of sound is too hard for us to do today.
Our planes can hardly hover, much less immediatly accelerate to the speed of sound and zoom off.
In your post you claim the evidence is nothing. You post like this a lot. You claim that the evidence presented is worthless, but you never actually
explain it.
So try. Explain this one case.
You say this is horrible evidence. Now tell us why. It's easy to say evidence is not evidence and then not actually explain anything.
So, what do you think this case is?
People making things up? I don't think so, there are more then 12 witnesses. Some of them respected military officers.
Some advanced military aircraft? Nope. We didn't have the technology to hover in midair and then shoot off at the speed of sound.
If the evidence is so bad, can you please give me an explanation for it? 'Cause I haven't seen any yet. And no one else has the last 53 years
either.


