It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by kamatty
Wow...
Pot meet kettle. How many videos have been sent to Al jazeera and other media outlets showing innocent people being killed / decapitated / blown up by the Taliban / Al Queida. Even if we remove the Al Queida link they still do that crap.
While our troops royally screwed up and should be held accountible, being we should take the highroad, the Taliban shouldnt be the ones lecturing us on video / bad acts.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by kamatty
Wow...
Pot meet kettle. How many videos have been sent to Al jazeera and other media outlets showing innocent people being killed / decapitated / blown up by the Taliban / Al Queida. Even if we remove the Al Queida link they still do that crap.
While our troops royally screwed up and should be held accountible, being we should take the highroad, the Taliban shouldnt be the ones lecturing us on video / bad acts.
Damn straight, the taliban are scumbags. I'm against the Afghan war, but on the other hand the ordinary people of that country are terrified of these brutal savages and their repressive regime, decapitating school teachers, shooting or hanging young women who stray from their tyrannical ideologies and so on(you can easily find videos of these sickening acts online). I say f**k the taliban, they show zero respect for their enemies, dead or alive, they indoctrinate young men to go and blow themselves up in public places, killing innocent men women and children, and then a video like this comes out and a**holes everywhere are going mad about how disgraceful it is, asinine fools.edit on 17-1-2012 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)
Dramatic increases in infant mortality, cancer and leukaemia in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, which was bombarded by US Marines in 2004, exceed those reported by survivors of the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, according to a new study.
Iraqi doctors in Fallujah have complained since 2005 of being overwhelmed by the number of babies with serious birth defects, ranging from a girl born with two heads to paralysis of the lower limbs. They said they were also seeing far more cancers than they did before the battle for Fallujah between US troops and insurgents.
Their claims have been supported by a survey showing a four-fold increase in all cancers and a 12-fold increase in childhood cancer in under-14s. Infant mortality in the city is more than four times higher than in neighbouring Jordan and eight times higher than in Kuwait.
Dr Chris Busby, a visiting professor at the University of Ulster and one of the authors of the survey of 4,800 individuals in Fallujah, said it is difficult to pin down the exact cause of the cancers and birth defects. He added that "to produce an effect like this, some very major mutagenic exposure must have occurred in 2004 when the attacks happened".
US Marines first besieged and bombarded Fallujah, 30 miles west of Baghdad, in April 2004 after four employees of the American security company Blackwater were killed and their bodies burned. After an eight-month stand-off, the Marines stormed the city in November using artillery and aerial bombing against rebel positions. US forces later admitted that they had employed white phosphorus as well as other munitions.
In the assault US commanders largely treated Fallujah as a free-fire zone to try to reduce casualties among their own troops. British officers were appalled by the lack of concern for civilian casualties. "During preparatory operations in the November 2004 Fallujah clearance operation, on one night over 40 155mm artillery rounds were fired into a small sector of the city," recalled Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster, a British commander serving with the American forces in Baghdad.
He added that the US commander who ordered this devastating use of firepower did not consider it significant enough to mention it in his daily report to the US general in command. Dr Busby says that while he cannot identify the type of armaments used by the Marines, the extent of genetic damage suffered by inhabitants suggests the use of uranium in some form. He said: "My guess is that they used a new weapon against buildings to break through walls and kill those inside."
The resistance of the ruling class and of most Americans to one aspect of the truth about 9/11 remains astonishing, and it demonstrates how puerile our national conversation is. Of course, the ruling class cannot admit that to state the obvious fact that actions have consequences is not to say that the U.S. "deserved" 9/11 -- for to acknowledge the millions murdered by the U.S. government and our policy of aggressive military intervention across the globe would subject our own actions to the kinds of judgments that only the United States is entitled to make, and only about the actions of others. The United States is uniquely exempt from the standards we apply to everyone else; thus runs the catechism at the church of our inherent national superiority.
...
Our national catechism tells us that America is Good -- and that America's murders are Good Murders. You may not say otherwise.
Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot
reply to post by blackmirage0311
Semper Fi, brother. How's the Corps these days?
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
1-I can't even take you seriously.
2- I guess I got a little out of hand with my previous post. First time I've had one deleted. I usually keep my emotions in check, but I let them show a little too much.
3- My point on this is that what they did is like child's play compared to what they do or will do to us.
4- Of course, it's just like a Marine to video tape something they know they're not supposed to be doing and post it on the internet. Seen that happen more times than I think I should have when I was in.
Originally posted by Badgered1
If you're okay with it - and I am honestly passing no judgement here - it's okay for them to do it to 'your' fighters, right?
Youtube videos of Afghan/Taliban/Iraqi/Al Quaida fighters peeing on American military will be met by you with open arms/hearts and full support?
Oh, did I hit a nerve?
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by kamatty
The worst part about all of this is that 92% of the Afghans they are fighting dont even know about 9/11.
The real tragedy, the crime, is the murder of these people.
Anyone killed is instantly labeled by the US Government as an "insurgent, terrorist or Taliban". What a great system: I kill you and just need to say that you're a "bad guy", case closed.
These victims are not "insurgents" or "terrorists". Theyre probably not even "Taliban", whatever that means. They are simple Afghans, the vast majority of whom, dont even know about 9/11...
All they know is that their country is under attack by America, as usual, and they are fighting to defend it, as ANYONE would do.
This is a FACT and is NEVER mentioned by the war mongering presstitutes, both "Liberal" and Conservative.