Evidence includes the testimony of a high ranking military officer with the Army R&D Department...Phillip Corso. Evidence also includes the testimony
of several top scientists who claim that the one credited with the invention of the transistor, could not have done so on his own. There is further
evidence, and I might get back to it (dates, times, companies, etc.) but that's just off the top of my head.
Are we not doing scientists (and human intelligence) a disservice to claim that planes, rockets, atomic energy, you name it, was inherited from
alien technology? Surely there's nothing alien about the stealth bomber's radar-resistance design... surely it's down to good old fashioned human
ingenuity.
Not at all. It still takes a lot of intelligence and ingenuity to reverse engineer something beyond your understanding, and such scientists still
deserve a round of applause. Imagine a caveman finding a record player. After fooling around a bit, he gets it to work! It's still an amazing
acheivement. Given the timeline, planes and atomic energy seem unlikely to be derived from alien tech. In fact, it's likely our first use of such
weapons that attracted such large numbers of them at the time. As for stealth, I'm sure that such a recovery would have aided in the idea of
composites, etc. In fact, according to Corso, much of the tech we've been able to derive, was in the area of materials, such as Kevlar, and stealth
composites, etc.
From the early discoveries of electromagnetism, through to computer theory and quantum mechanics, a line of discovery and thought can be
traced.
Not always. Because these bits and pieces were farmed out to defense contractors, companies, not men, got the credit for their advances. One guy
thought another guy on the team did it, and so on...
Could it be possible that an archetypal Roswell incident actually took place at some point in the twentith century? Could it have happened more
than once?
The evidence is certainly convincing. Likewise, there is evidence of a recovered crash in Germany in 1936. Soon after, the Nazis came out with
saucer prototypes by the dozens, and made other advances, leaps and bounds above their Allied counterparts. The scientist grab by the US and USSR
(project paperclip) after the war, and then the subsequent space programs of both, also lend credence to the arguement. If it was just human
ingenuity at work, why did it take so long for others to come up with it??? Then we have Roswell. The points for it being a saucer crash are almost
too numerous to list (and I've done it on over a hundred posts, hehe...) Then we have numerous advances after it as well.
bearing in mind that, in order to reverse engineer, the human mind has to be able to understand the technology, and if we can understand it,
what's to stop us from thinking it up for ourselves?
True, and nobody's saying we didn't. We had early workups and ideas of the transistor before it's actual invention. Likewise with night vision,
etc. But...the discovery of these pieces of wreckage, when put into the hands of people already working on such ideas, was what made it possible for
them to get off of the drawing board, out of the lab, and into usage. I'd bet good money there is still tons we don't know about that ship, mostly
in the area of propulsion, and manipulation of gravity. Lazar's (whether you believe him or not) testimony on this is additional evidence. (up to
the individual to decide whether good evidence or not).
Other evidence is found in government documents (many of which are still being authenticated, but so far stand up to scrutinization). There are
documents which describe the interiors of the ships, and components, using the language of their day. When viewed from current times, it seems clear
that such documents are describing fibre optic tubing, circuit boards, etc. (though they didn't know it at the time).