It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fry2
They are legal as well. Nearly as heavily regulated by the BATF. You need to pay a manufacturing tax of $600.00 last time I looked as well as fill out the forms explaining why you need/want one. It is considered a firearm in and of itself as well!!! Something to keep in mind...
I would love to have one for my handgun for teaching shooting to my family and friends at my summer place in the mountains but I do and will continue to abide by the law(even though this one bugs me) and not own one until such time.
Any of you who have gone shooting without "ears" knows what I'm talking about
In Baltimore we have the some of the most strict gun laws. Including a ban on carrying guns in an automobile. But then we have the highest crime and murder rates.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Since you live in Canada you dont have to worry about any law abiding citizen getting his hands on any of this stuff.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Now, I have little objection to the bigger clips, obvious pistol grip, bayonet lug or muzzle brake. It's things like silencers, full auto weapons, bizzare ammunition and grenade launchers that really put me off. It was a miracle more people weren't killed when they hosed down that shop.
DE
No, I have to worry about it crossing the border and ending up on Jane and Finch. A few months ago, a single mother was hit by a round fired from a Colt AR-15 (chambered to what, I have no idea) and was paralyzed from the waist down. Yeah, little bit of a legitimate worry there. More and more guns are turning up in that area of the city, and I'm getting worried since from there, it'll spread.
Originally posted by Fry2
Just curious...
Would you folks who say you are pro-Second Amendment but anti-"Assault Weapons" be OK with people owning "assault weapons" if there were licensing and tough background checks like in many states for handgun permits?
[edit on 13-9-2004 by Fry2]
What kills me is that it was stolen in Ontario.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Fry2
Just curious...
Would you folks who say you are pro-Second Amendment but anti-"Assault Weapons" be OK with people owning "assault weapons" if there were licensing and tough background checks like in many states for handgun permits?
[edit on 13-9-2004 by Fry2]
I'd have no problem with that. Then the more dangerous rifles would be in the hands of those that can care for them properly.
Originally posted by intrepid
I think that it's quite evident that I know about firearms, that I would not use them as cavalierly as you does not lessen my abillity. I do not recall baiting you. I do recall addressing a post that meantioned my views as lunacy. Did you think that would go unchallenged? Yes I am a Mod but that is immaterial here. Do you see me threatening you, no. I'm addressing your posts and when you can't handle an opposing view you start crying foul. Bad form.
Indeed. But my view is surprisingly conservative, you might say. But ti does prove a point- an automatic can end up in criminal hands if they steal it from your house. Let's see your permit stop that!
DE
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I'm not crying foul, but clearly when a mod goes up against a mere member in a heated debate a power differential exists.
The assertion that I use firearms cavalierly is without basis and offensive, without some means by which the allegation can be substantiated.
I've stated my case.
[edit on 04/9/13 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
In hunting, there are no one shot one kill scenarios. One should always have another round handy or another hunter to insure a clean kill. The Assault weapons ban does not address automatic weapons. In fact, all the weapons are semi-automatic.
Originally posted by intrepidNo hunter worth his mettle would pull the trigger unless he was sure of dropping his quarry. One shot kills are the norm, not the exception.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
And whether or not you care to admit it, you are baiting me by attacking me personally regarding things about which you have no knowledge.
[edit on 04/9/13 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by intrepid
Careful, guys. We are getting close to "trash" territory. Keep it clean.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by intrepid
Careful, guys. We are getting close to "trash" territory. Keep it clean.
Originally posted by Fry2
I actually agree with Intrepid I'm NOT a hunter though...
I don't see an AR-15 as an effective deer rifle. It's just too small of a bullet.
There are much more powerful rifles for such purposes.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Indeed. But my view is surprisingly conservative, you might say. But ti does prove a point- an automatic can end up in criminal hands if they steal it from your house. Let's see your permit stop that!
DE