It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Does the prosecution say screw you, you tried to kill someone and lock him up?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by YouAreLiedTo
I hope I understood your question.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Does the prosecution say screw you, you tried to kill someone and lock him up?
The short answer is that Sharia law doesn't matter. The state would prosecute or not based on US secular law.
*Read Open_minded Skeptic's posts in this thread.
Sharia Law would be used in conjunction with US law, where it does not violate it. Sharia law is not used INSTEAD of US secular law.
edit on 1/11/2012 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Sharia Law would be used in conjunction with US law, where it does not violate it. Sharia law is not used INSTEAD of US secular law.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
And what about rape, kidnapping, bodily mutilation...
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Ok, I issue a question...
If two islamics are in a criminal trial for attempted homicide, and the state says they will prosecute no matter if the victim wants to press charges or not....
I don't think Sharia law would cover this type crime.
And you'd be wrong.
I don't think so.
I research a lot of stuff. This is a subject I've researched before - - I just don't remember the details.
I think murder and/or attempted murder would fall under US law.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
And what about rape, kidnapping, bodily mutilation...
Those are ALL against Us Law. They would not be allowed.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
And what about rape, kidnapping, bodily mutilation...
Those are ALL against Us Law. They would not be allowed.
SO WHY NOT FOLLOW USA LAW IN EVERYTHING THEN?!?!
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
And what about rape, kidnapping, bodily mutilation...
Those are ALL against Us Law. They would not be allowed.
SO WHY NOT FOLLOW USA LAW IN EVERYTHING THEN?!?!
Hopping cats, how many times does it need to be said? That is exactly what happens. US Secular law trumps any religous law. Period. Done. Finis.
Originally posted by Aeons
If the Vatican were doing this, these champions of this would be howling bloody madness at the moon about it.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
SO WHY NOT FOLLOW USA LAW IN EVERYTHING THEN?!?!
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
SO WHY NOT FOLLOW USA LAW IN EVERYTHING THEN?!?!
They DO. Anyone in the US has to follow US law. As I said earlier, some people want ADDITIONAL religious laws to apply to them because it's part of practicing their religion. It's religious freedom. It doesn't hurt anyone.
You guys think Sharia law in the US will result in beheadings, kidnappings, child rape and homicide because that's what you've been told by the Islamaphobic fear mongers. Don't believe everything you hear.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Suffice to say I don't want any religion, Christian, Islamic or other, in my courts.
The state was simply trying to make it official and now the courts block it, and say religion and culture should be allowed.
THIS is where I have a problem...
Originally posted by Open_Minded SkepticDo I support the right of BH's woodchippers to settle their private contract according to Sharia law? Yes, absolutely.
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by Open_Minded SkepticDo I support the right of BH's woodchippers to settle their private contract according to Sharia law? Yes, absolutely.
If your contract violates the law, or human rights then it is an unacceptable breech of regulatory framework.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by Open_Minded SkepticDo I support the right of BH's woodchippers to settle their private contract according to Sharia law? Yes, absolutely.
If your contract violates the law, or human rights then it is an unacceptable breech of regulatory framework.
Agreed. How exactly does an agreement between two people to settle a breach of contract by exchange of 20 sheep a violation of law or human rights?
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Would you be in favor of a state voting to USE Sharia law? What if Michigan voted and 60% of them voted to use Sharia Law instead of Christian Law...
This county had better NOT be using Christian law any more than Sharia law. Both are forbidden by the US Constitution. This is a SECULAR nation.
This court made the right decision... Also, note that the decision is that the petitioner has the right to challenge the OK law...