Romney, Gingrich and Santorum : we will make porn illegal, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 43 times


reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 09:27 AM by jtma508
reply to post by FlyersFan



Not so sure about that. See my post about 3 up from yours. This is exactly how the Federal Gov't works. They're not interested in private industry. Only their industry.


reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 10:22 AM by Rapha
Originally posted by Lulzaroonie
Please! They would never shut down a billion dollar industry!

internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com...

Internet Pornography Statistics
The amount of pornography on the internet can be difficult to fathom. A total of 4.2 million websites contain pornography. That is 12 percent of the total number of websites. There are 100,000 websites that offer pornography.


If they got their way an eighth (1/8) of the internet would be shut down. Thats a lot of money disappearing in 1 second.

I agree. The porn industry will never be shut down.



reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 10:48 AM by Lulzaroonie
Originally posted by jtma508
reply to
post by Lulzaroonie



Sure they would. Cause they would be able to replace it with a multi-billion dollar enforcement agency under their control and staffed/operated by their friends and chosen minions on the taxpayers' dime. War on terror, check. War on drugs, check. War on illegals, check. War on porn, check.

"Everything is a business model." - George Ure


The porn industry is worth billions of dollars of revenue for the Governments coffers.
How is shutting that down going to be financially viable when the country is in what is it now... 8 trillion dollars of debt?
All any thing comes down to at the end of the day is the green stuff.
edit on 11-1-2012 by Lulzaroonie because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 10:49 AM by getreadyalready
reply to post by Vitchilo



Proof that although they all steal plays from Ron Paul's book, none of them truly understand it. They are still playing politics from 50 or 75 years ago. They are completely out of touch with why the Tea Party had so much success in 2010, and why Ron Paul is so popular now, and why OWS got so popular so fast.

Those 3 have no idea what the population wants.

All the while, Obama's wife is appearing on Icarly, and he is tweeting pics of his dog, and posting his March Madness bracket pics.

Those old, stiff, white, religious freak Republicans have no chance in hell at beating Obama, but Ron Paul does!!! If the GOP wants to win, they will nominate Paul. If they want to be severely whooped and embarrassed by Obama, they will pick another good ol' religious white boy like they have done for centuries.

And the ironic thing, is Paul is devoutly religious!!! Probably more so than the other 3! Definitely moreso than Newt!

Paul can carry that religious conservative vote, as well as the Tea Party Conservative vote, and as well as the pop-culture young vote!

Why are folks so blind?


reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 11:18 AM by snowspirit
They've been discussing the idea of banning some types of contraception too.
I wonder which one of these ridiculous ideas they thought of first.
www.lifesitenews.com...

If they managed to ban birth control, having porn around, it would be impossible to abstain, which is the method of birth control that a couple of the republicans seem to prefer.

Now all they have to do is to ban masturbation completely, and we'll have some really really really bitchy men out there, ready for war.

Some of these politicians just cannot seem to stay out of people's bedrooms, or where ever else people like to do it.



reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 01:18 PM by SeekerofTruth101
The 3 of them are only playing to the conservatives, whom believed in only hypocrisy - white in front but stained dark inside where they thought no is watching. That's the true conservatives for you. It had been such for centuries since civilisation began.

I am all for a END to the porn industry. It belittles and demean womanhood, espacially, when most them had been forced or enticed unconscionably into it. We all came from women, without them, none of us would exists. Womanhood do deserves and must be respected.

But we must be realistic. We humans need money to live, and often, money calls the shot. Many humans - male or female would NEVER have sought to sell the bodies if they don't have to. It is only the fastest way to earn a few bucks than to starve on the streets. Not many are that strong in face of adversity of life.

Thus, the root of this social problem lays not in just banning porn, but a true and pragmatic action plan to boost the economy, give opportunities for all, so that they may not be forced or enticed into vices.

But that's not what the 3 bas*ards are doing. Banning porn is an easy escape and gain votes, but had they resolve the root of the problem? None. Only further posturing to gain hypocratic votes. It is NOT porn that they should be targetting, but the economy.

Thailand had long been known as a vice capital. But today, the change had began. Legislations to protect minority ages to prevent them from being sold. Wealth distributed. Trainning courses in economic jobs began. It may be slow, but change is on the horizon, and Thailand will lead the way.

It is sad to see the state of women in China with wealth gap too far. But change must come.

As for the western world, there is absolutely no reason for porn to NOT be eradicated, or at least minimise to only those whom are not forced or with opportunities in life to choose. The western world is fully educated to CREATE opportunities, but only that....the leaders and the conservatives are full of hypocrisy BS. They dont know how those women suffered, nor want to know to alleviate their sufferings. Bas*ards! Bas*tards! All three of them!
edit on 11-1-2012 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 01:21 PM by groingrinder
Originally posted by Sippy Cup
reply to
post by buni11687



This isn’t trying to get into your personal sex life, if you want to have a get together with who ever fine, it just wants to remove something that is not morally sound from the block.

If you had a crack house on your block you would be all up in their business trying to get it shut down and removed, would'nt you? Ok same thing here!

edit on 11-1-2012 by Sippy Cup because: (no reason given)


Apples and Oranges. Crack kills it's users. Porn usually does not. Also I have never known anyone who would rob or kill to feed their porn addiction.
edit on 1-11-2012 by groingrinder because: Edited to remove pornography.



reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 02:09 PM by grey580
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101



All porn stars have an option to say no.
I have yet to see a legitimate porn movie be made while a gun was pointed to the actresses head.

If you don't like porn.
You have the freedom to not to watch it.

However don't take away my right to watch it.


reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 03:37 PM by Obsidian303
reply to post by Vitchilo



Larry Flynt will be getting ready for war again!!.

If they did ban porn, (Which im hoping they dont!!). How would they implement it?
A Porn Amnesty?.

I can see everyone rushing to queue up now.

Peace


reply posted on 11-1-2012 @ 03:49 PM by wutz4tom
reply to post by Vitchilo



These guys are soo out of touch....
What happened to people (adults),making their own choices??
Does everything that gives any pleasure have to be taken away before the sheople take notice??
edit on 11-1-2012 by wutz4tom because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags