It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ouch. And yet, probably accurate.
Originally posted by PapaKrok
Wow. All THREE illuminati work there in a double wide trailer!!
Looks like I may have taken this a bit too seriously….
Who has all the power in the world? The People? The elected representatives of the People? Or is it the banks, corporations, bond markets, dynastic families, hereditary monarchs and the super rich?
Answer? - FOLLOW THE MONEY. The flow of money is the flow of power. Dollars are the amoral units of power and are overwhelmingly held by the amoral (or indeed immoral) super rich. The closer you are to the money flow, the more you can divert into your own pockets, hence the incredible wealth of bankers.
Money is a "proximity phenomenon" - the closer you are to its source, to its flow, the better. So, the rich ENSURE they are in closest proximity, while the ordinary people find themselves very far away. Those who are furthest of all from the money require State hand-outs, charity or must beg.
1% (the rich) command and 99% (the poor) obey. Isn't it time for genuine People Power rather than the fake version served up by dumbocracy? Then the People must take the money of the rich - or we'll be their slaves forever. In this time of global financial meltdown, anyone who does not advocate a vast and unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the rich to the People is an Enemy of the People. Any defence of the rich is an attack on the People. The Old World Order is dead. It's time to push it into its grave.
Free market capitalism has demonstrated that the market controls the economic and hence political agenda. Who and what constitutes the market? What is the market's purpose? Who elected any of the participants in the market? What are the political affiliations of these participants? How wealthy are they?
These people are scum and it's time they were swept away by the people's righteous anger, just as they were in the French and Russian Revolutions.
Can anyone seriously believe that five hundred years from now, humanity will still be operating under capitalist democracy with the top 1% controlling almost half of the wealth of the world? Capitalist democracy WILL be replaced. The only question is what will replace it. The solution does not lie in democracy. Democracy has failed decisively and irrevocably. Free market capitalism has failed decisively and irrevocably.
To be interested in conspiracy theories, you have to be prepared for conflict. Them and Us. The Enemy. You have no desire to "relate" to those oppressing you. It is impossible for other-directed people - women in particular - to be attracted to conspiracy theories. They would rather go shopping.
In many ways, women are the key to overthrowing the Old World Order. Tragically, they are the least likely to care about the tyranny of the OWO. They are shopaholics and gossip addicts, and no conceivable threat to the OWO. Which is exactly as the OWO planned. One of the Illuminati's main missions is to make women wake up.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by valkyrie7
How do you know there is an enemy?
When you construct an enemy that is invisible and separate from you, you open it to become whatever evils you desire.
This usually makes 99% of what you think about them false.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
reply to post by NeoVain
Thanks for the link to the webpage.
Very interesting and I am reading now and will continue.
The page is bookmarked
Have to say that meritocracy and freedom is the best way to go.
What I do not understand is that allot of the people (politicians) in the OWO are promoting the NWO...
How does that work with the Illuminati if they now are against the OWO, are they against the people whom infact are promoting for them?
Or is it two different NWO in the loop, fighting against each other, to be the winning one?
The Illuminati NWO against the PTB NWO?edit on 11-1-2012 by LiberalSceptic because: (no reason given)