Well it's interesting. To say the least. This will probably reach triple-digit pages.
Whether it is significant is I guess the debate that is going to be raging on.
From what we know, The Illuminati started as a group of science-minds working in secret due to The Heresy Laws of the time.
Now given they(science-minds) do not need to work secretly ever again, for fear of being demonised, this takes away the ideology of needing a Secret
Society to further their works.
So the only two options left are it is all a cods-wallop ploy to divert attention from the true Elite, or that another group has adopted the
Illuminatus title for their new agenda.
Now I'm a firm believer in the first option.
I could go into full detail, but I'll just give a couple of examples.
People hear/see Rockefeller & Rothschild, automatically they are "illuminati".
Because of a YouTube video? Give me a break. Type in their names and by the time you put "David rocke..." It already gives the option of Illuminati
videos. Seriously give it a go. To me, that's a little unfair.
"Why?" they ask. "They're the richest people on the planet!" they claim.
Well no, they're not. David Rockefeller isn't even in the top 200 richest people on the planet. And the guy is 98 so let's give him a break.
The Rothschild's are only part of the wealthiest as an entire family, separately they are miles away from Warren Buffet, Carlos Slim and other elite
in the rich list.
Finally with those videos that "expose" the elite, how many African names pop up, how many Asian names? Not a single one!?! Hmmmm.
Well as with Chinese suppression of Internet info I'd hazard a guess that they have the most powerful elite in the planet. The nameless! The
anonymous(not to be mistaken with Secret Service "activist movement" who misunderstand Guy Fawkes).
The true elite, who are in the shadows, unlike Rothschild & Rockefeller who are the target of every "Illuminati/NWO" video on the Internet.
I could go into more detail as I said, but you can take this and use it however you choose, for when you piece the puzzle together.
Overall i think it is a very deceptive subject, and also a very, very convenient premise.
I like David Icke, but I don't agree with everything he says, including Illuminati, Royals and NWO(also reptiles but that's another topic) etc.
At the same time I disagree with the premise that it is the Old World Order we need to fight.
Personally because the OWO was the NWO, and it already took place with the colony's on the "New World".
So I usually dodge those sort of debates as it seems people don't seem to realise the NWO has already occurred.
It's not a conspiracy from the dollar bill, it was a Pre-Columbus ideology, and a far as I know they succeeded, whether right or wrong, again that's
Really "NWO"/"OWO" just seem like another distraction from the truth.
Some have said it's like the Devil saying he isn't evil.
Then we could also argue it may be a "better the devil you know" type of scenario!
Would I trust these self-proclaimed "Illuminati good guys"?
About as much as I'd trust Anonymous. Which isn't much, for reasons already explained, but if you missed it, what's to trust about a group who uses
someone else's name/face for an agenda that is nothing to do with the originals ideology?
Starred for such an interesting topic though!
edit on 23-1-2014 by CharlieSpeirs because: Auto-Correct!