It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
But do you really think those mountains/craters in the background look far away? They don't to me but of course this is not a 3D video so we can't get a sense of how far away they actually are.
Back in the 60s and early 70s they tried to explain this as an optical illusion on the moon, that objects appear closer than they are on the moon, both to astronauts and on camera.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by ProfessorAlfB
Jarrah White a fraud?
He has been so thoroughly busted that every time you bring up his name, everyone else on this thread laughs out loud. If you refuse to read the entire thread out of laziness, at least read the six or seven posts starting here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Well, I had a read and what a supprise, I find that you are the one that thinks he busted him!
OK, so he used the results for an unshielded spacecraft, perhaps he read the paper in a hurry and he used that first table because he was in a hurry to post something in response to pressing questions? Who knows?
He makes mistakes, we all do, but you can't simply denounce all the information in his "MoonFaker" videos as nothing but lies, especially when much of what he says can be seen to be patently true.
Thomas Edison made lots of mistakes too, like stubbornly sticking to DC power when Tesla and Westinghouse had proved AC to be the better system for distributing it, but you can't simply denounce the rest of Edisons other work as completely fraudulent!
Its pays to keep an open mind, but yours is obviously closed.
So even in the shielded environment on the ISS, every single day the Astronauts absorb a dose the same as someone would get in a year on Earth, from natural sources! So much for the complete safety of a spacecraft in LEO!
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
No, I said I am convinced there is another such chamber at Groom lake
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
So even in the shielded environment on the ISS, every single day the Astronauts absorb a dose the same as someone would get in a year on Earth from natural sources! So much for the complete safety of a spacecraft in LEO!edit on 3/2/13 by ProfessorAlfB because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by captainpudding
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
So even in the shielded environment on the ISS, every single day the Astronauts absorb a dose the same as someone would get in a year on Earth from natural sources! So much for the complete safety of a spacecraft in LEO!edit on 3/2/13 by ProfessorAlfB because: (no reason given)
Let's take a look at this lovely little straw man. How many people have died on missions outside of LEO vs. how many people have died on LEO missions? I'll save you the trouble, it's 0/18.
Originally posted by Ove38
If they were on the moon, how come they're not allowed to tell us, how it was on the moon ?
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
But do you really think those mountains/craters in the background look far away? They don't to me but of course this is not a 3D video so we can't get a sense of how far away they actually are.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by ProfessorAlfB
Once again YOU miss the point if an image has been altered it can be checked!
What about the second video and the Hadley ridge any comments on that
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by ProfessorAlfB
I thought you claimed to be a professional photographer I mean the IMAGE can be checked for manipulation or have you not heard or seen that before.
So if the Apollo craft have been edited in we could see evidence of that
BUT the simple fact we can compare OBJECTS in 40 yr old pictures taken on the Moon with the images from the LRO, objects so small that the only way they could be seen 40 yrs ago was if someone was in the same location as them is the best possible evidence.
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
Apparently the CIA insisted on editing all the Apollo photos before they were released to the public
Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by ProfessorAlfB
Please give proof of these photos that have been edited. Remember, in the 60's and 70's there wasn't any "photo shop". So you will have to show proof using technology of the time. Specific identification will be necessary. Conjecture and "it looks like" will not suffice.
"Before computers, photo manipulation was achieved by retouching with ink, paint, double-exposure, piecing photos or negatives together in the darkroom, or scratching Polaroids.