It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by wmd_2008
They sent remote rovers there prior. That's what those tracks are, if they're even tracks at all. That's equally as plauable if not more so than the rover
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by wmd_2008
They sent remote rovers there prior. That's what those tracks are, if they're even tracks at all. That's equally as plauable if not more so than the rover
Moving from the earth to the moon there would be at least this amount of exposure to the error of aberration if not more given the uncertainties regarding the trajectories. The error could not be less than it is from here on earth.
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by wmd_2008
They sent remote rovers there prior. That's what those tracks are, if they're even tracks at all. That's equally as plauable if not more so than the rover
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by Phage
Bart Sibrel. Maker of "A Funny Thing Happened" and a true jackass.
His crap about leaked footage is lies. His out of context clips, more so.
edit on 1/10/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Thats the Best you can do with this? Name calling? Where is the hard science you are so often known for?
I dunno.. that vid makes sense and you have not proven it wrong. Either your slipping or, your not to be trusted. Which is it ?
Originally posted by Junkheap
The narrator in that video speaks in a constant monotone drone as if to brainwash members of a cult. I wonder why that is.
The aberration problem I refer to is not something you can wish away. Read the accounts about Apollo GNC hardware and software.
Originally posted by telescopeAl
reply to post by Gibborium
Of course we can reach the moon. Rangers were essentially ballistic missiles, no fancy guidance. Surveyors landed. This does not mean the point about the Apollo ship is not valid. The aberration problem I refer to is not something you can wish away. Read the accounts about Apollo GNC hardware and software. No where is this taken into account and we now see this is the reason for the astronauts avoiding subject. Look again at NASA's own document. 20 arcseconds error is not acceptable per NASA.
Your argument is we have proof we went to the moon because we went to the moon. That is a tautology and tautologies say nothing.
that I have just shown with some help that the navigation system did not have the requisite accuracy and nowhere can you show me a NASA document taking this into consideration.
As I said, ding dong the witch s dead. Full speed now with our investigation of this issue. Think of that unbelievable story about Apollo 13. Off by more than 50 arcseconds? 100? You bet! We have our solution. Apollo is dead.
I'll say it once more time and then stop for a while since no person is addressing my main point.
Originally posted by telescopeAl
reply to post by eriktheawful
It is not off topic. I showed why the astronauts in that video are not on their way to the moon and so why I can say confidently the video was a hoax video. My points are very good and very much on topic and others before me started it in this direction. I found the key article by NASA and drew the key conclusion. Many others posting here are much further afield of this all. I acknowledged my help in all of this but am entitled to emphasize the greatness of these days. It is a complete proof of the hoax and absolutely true and strong because if you cannot navigate you cannot go. This is a great day for all of us who have studied the hoax. This is the first invulnerable proof we have and time will show what a great day this is.