reply to post by telescopeAl
I have a great idea to help people that are not scientists understand my discoveries. For astronauts to go to the moon stars appearance from travel
would have had to look the same as stars appearance from earth to a high degree of precision. Because this is not true I can show Apollo to be a
For the Apollo astronauts to fly to the moon they must be able to sight the stars. When they sight the stars the idea is that they are determining
the exact direction the ship is pointing. It is not so much to find the ship's location because the big dishes on the ground can find the ship in
space. But the dishes cannot tell which direction the nose is pointing only the astronauts can do this by pointing their telescopes at the stars and
OK, you all have this very great. Now the star chart the astronauts use is made on earth and loaded into the computer and cannot be changed. But
once the astronauts leave the earth the positions of the stars do change by a tiny bit because the ship's movement is different from the earth's
movement. The ship moves independent of the earth. This is how it is supposed to find the moon. So the stars on the ride to the moon would look in
slightly different place if the trip was a real trip owing to the movement of the spaceship. The amount of this movement can be as much as 20
arcseconds which is an angular measurement. This is a tiny tiny angle but significant in this case because the distances are so very great with it
being 400,000 kilometers to the moon.
OK very good everyone has that. Now NASA's engineers wrote the paper I quoted above that showed us for the astronauts to find the moon safely the
angular error in star sighting must be 10 arcseconds or less. So because the star charts are hard wired and do not compensate in any ways for the
movement and the aberration I showed by NASA's own engineer's calculation that the GNC is inadequate. When they sighted a star if the trip was a real
one it could have been off by 20 arcseconds or even more because the error is compounded by multiple series of measurements. The ship's alignment
attitude is therefore not accurately known and the ship travels away from the desired course with each measurement possibly compounding previous
OK great. Now there is nothing they can do on the ground to correct for this error. It does not matter how good their dish is or how big the
computers are. Only the astronauts can do the alignment. So I proved Apollo is a hoax and confirmed the video shown at the top of this thread must
be hoax because the astronauts in the video could not truly find the stars with the needed accuracy.
It is important to know that the US and Russia did crash landed and soft landed vehicles on the moon. The problem I wrote about above has to do with
Apollo ships where accuracy must be much greater and safety margin greater. If you crash land or soft land something without a person it is OK if it
misses target but not with the astronauts.
I can summarize and say stars from a trip traveling to the moon look different and are in slightly different locations than stars as seen from the
earth because of the ship's movement which is also called aberration effect. This difference was not accounted for by the hoax planners and the fact
it is not accounted for proves they could not accurately navigate and so proves the hoax. It proves this video at the beginning of the thread here is
hoax. I give lots of credit to the other persons that introduced this because their posts lead me to the key NASA article.
31-10-2012 by telescopeAl because: corrections spelling