Fake Earth illusion - footage from Apollo 11, 1969, page 26
Pages: <<  23    24    25    26  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 87 times


reply posted on 24-1-2012 @ 08:09 PM by Illustronic
reply to post by WeekendWarrior


I don't trot intuition assumptions as fact. You talk a lot about picture you see yet we see none of them with any reference and you know, seeing images on Youtube compression doesn't count, unless you are arguing something other than the image quality. You need to reference the NASA tiff files available before I entertain any of your supposed image tampering fantasies.

Now get to work and show something we can look at, so far you come off as some kind of self appointed god of bull#, and are very good at it, not to mention pulling the insult cord, using smilies to incite, and basically professing everything you with no examples. No my friend I would never sit down to a beer with folks of your like. I'd rather get a root canal done on a tooth that doesn't need one instead.

When you decide to start a debate I may entertain such, until then I'll have a beer with my dentist.


reply posted on 24-1-2012 @ 08:16 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by WeekendWarrior




And there is a load of satellite images of moon with a clear airbrushing going on in them.


Doesn't seem that you grasp the whole "point" of airbrushing......IF a photo needed to be "airbrushed" to "hide" something, then you would never know it happened!!!

This is what I find so hilarious about these claims. The examples that are used are laughable because what is being identified as "airbrushing" are merely image artifacts of one type or another.

Really, the entire business of Moon "hoax" promotion is designed as a con-job for the gullible and under-informed.
edit on Tue 24 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 25-1-2012 @ 02:21 AM by wmd_2008
reply to post by WeekendWarrior


If they REALLY wanted to hide something they wouldn't bother to show the picture it really is that simple or is that to simple for you to understand.

I have said this before and will say it agian for your benefit!

When NASA went to the Moon and said they had ,they would not have known when another country could have sent a probe,mission or built a telescope large enough to prove them wrong.

It wouldn't matter if it was a week, a month, a year or a centuary after the last mission thats a risk they couldn't take!
edit on 25-1-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
edit on 25-1-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 14-4-2012 @ 10:22 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by Epicurus


Exactly!

It's a wonder that so very many people fall for the nonsense claims made by Bart Sibrel, about the "Low Earth Orbit" filming "fakery". It (sadly) almost had you going for a moment too! That is how devious and deceptive some slick editing can be, when intended as it was by Sibrel......

Especially obvious movement when in LEO (low Earth orbit) is apparent in any of the are loads of videos available to see actual footage from the ISS and from all of the Space Shuttle missions......

This is looking down, at the Earth, from the ISS....and appears to be in real time (in other words, not time lapse). Meaning, if YOU were there, holding the camera and a cardboard cut-out trying to "simulate a round Earth in the distance", the the motion (and changing cloud patterns and continents whizzing by) would be obvious:



This is a thorough debunk of the ridiculous Bart Sibrel "film" and his so-called "proof"......and, this is only the tip of the iceberg of other complete debunks of his nonsense claims.


ETA: Amazingly, at this point....this thread went for 26 PAGES! and over 85 FLAGS, and this simple concept hadn't been understood by so many (at least 85+ people who flagged it, apparently)......
edit on Sat 14 April 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  23    24    25    26  >>    ^^TOP^^