It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What's this? It becomes Humanity's fault if NO ONE wants to buy Iranian oil? And Iran has the right to shut down a passageway that belongs to All Humanity?
...if the enemies impose sanctions on the export of our oil, we won't allow a drop of oil to pass through the Strait of Hormuz."
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by Shermanator
Iran is going to get a bomb... Iran WILL end up bombing Israel... It is a shame...
Despite your unfortunate choice of the "Shermanator" , it's refreshing to see the truth laid out so plainly.
On this topic-
Slowly the whole world is coming to realize what Iran's leaders are and the danger they represent. First Pakistan, then North Korea and now Iran. Eventually one or the other will teach the world the lesson that there are times when we must intervene.
Originally posted by McGintyBut with this statement it's clear that Iran is equally motivated by $s, since they are saying that if you don't buy our oil, then you buy no one else's oil (please correct me if that's inaccurate).
Originally posted by SabliciousYOU CANNOT TRUST ISLAMISTS.
Originally posted by Brasov
Originally posted by McGintyBut with this statement it's clear that Iran is equally motivated by $s, since they are saying that if you don't buy our oil, then you buy no one else's oil (please correct me if that's inaccurate).
Iran says: "if you forbid weaker nations to buy our oil then we forbid to buy U.S. puppets' oil too".
As a consequence of the U.S. extraterritorial laws other countries are forced to find alternative replacements of Iran's oil.
As a consequence of Iran's closure of the strait, other countries are forced to find alternative routes for U.S. puppets' oil.
Seems perfectly reciprocal to me, and it's up to the U.S. who started the "prohibition war" to pedal back and solve the problem.
Originally posted by McGinty
...if the enemies impose sanctions on the export of our oil, we won't allow a drop of oil to pass through the Strait of Hormuz."
Well Iran just lost the moral high ground there....
Previously the U.S. (and Nato) have been seen as the aggressors, concocting rebellions and wars in order to move in on the source of the oil.
But with this statement it's clear that Iran is equally motivated by $s, since they are saying that if you don't buy our oil, then you buy no one else's oil (please correct me if that's inaccurate).
So, it's one set of greedy bastards facing off against another, with innocent iranian public and U.S sheep-soldiers stuck in the middle.
Now the Iran establishment cannot say that they simply want what is theirs and are acting in self defence - blocking trade between peoples not within Iran is aggressive and prevocational.
Maybe you need to be a wolf to fight a wolf, but i think this move plays right into the hands of the U.S agenda and discredits Iran, making it that much easier to drive a wedge between Iran and those who would support them in a conflict.
I expect the U.S to bait Iran further, giving them enough rope to hang themselves in the eyes of their allies. If they can be baited into attacking a neighbour trying to transport oil to the U.S, it'll be the same wrong-move Saddam made when he invaded Kuwait, which allowed the U.S to attack Iraq.
It's simple chess played here by the U.S. - they're trying to put their opponent in a no-win situation: Either they get their oil from another source, damaging Iran's finances and enriching those of Iran's neighbours, or Iran goes on the attack, provoking their own defeat.
Checkmate.
edit on 11-1-2012 by McGinty because: To fix quotation mark error
Originally posted by McGinty
The question is, how are the U.S preventing other nations from buying Iran's oil.
Originally posted by McGinty
If it's through military blockade/threats of violence then Iran's 'blockade' will appear a proportional response: In other words Iran's allies can justify retaliatory threats if the U.S attack Iran.
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
The image that sprang to mind was a bully backing a kid into the corner, slapping the kid around the face repeatedly...
The kid says "slap me once more and I'll hit back"
and to you the kid becomes the aggressor..
Originally posted by Brasov
The U.S. has attacked Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya on much lesser grounds, it has no moral superiority over Iran. Iran has no choice, it's fight or starve.
Originally posted by McGinty
If it's through military blockade/threats of violence then Iran's 'blockade' will appear a proportional response: In other words Iran's allies can justify retaliatory threats if the U.S attack Iran.
Originally posted by Brasov
Any country that heeds the U.S. embargo against Iran's main trade is declaring war on Iran. It's up to them to engage in military actions or not, if they do they're willing to take the risks.
Originally posted by McGinty
At least not in the black and terms you suggest. To some, or many, hitting the bully back may back permissible, or even right, but it negates your right to claim moral superiority (at least to some extent). So if Iran strike they turn it into a fight, making the U.S an opponent rather than the playground bully.
Originally posted by Brasov
Originally posted by McGinty
At least not in the black and terms you suggest. To some, or many, hitting the bully back may back permissible, or even right, but it negates your right to claim moral superiority (at least to some extent). So if Iran strike they turn it into a fight, making the U.S an opponent rather than the playground bully.
You can engage in endless and pointless acrobatics in order to sell the pig, but all I can say is: making the U.S. an opponent? It was about time someone took up the bully!
Originally posted by McGinty
Originally posted by Brasov
You can engage in endless and pointless acrobatics in order to sell the pig, but all I can say is: making the U.S. an opponent? It was about time someone took up the bully!
Tell that to the dead Iranian children once the U.S have bombed the # out of them. I hope Iran are wise enough not to give 'cause' to the warmongers.