It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grey580Then why doesn't Iran use Thorium?
Originally posted by D8ncer
Noticed in a report that the experts were saying they had 3000 centrifuges running. This would not be enough to generate the required fuel for nuclear power stations.
Hence they stated it must for making a bomb.
They can’t win on this.
The more they decide to enrich for a power station or for medical reasons it will be seen as an attempt to enrich quicker and make a bomb.
If you know what I am trying to say.edit on 10-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by D8ncer
Noticed in a report that the experts were saying they had 3000 centrifuges running. This would not be enough to generate the required fuel for nuclear power stations.
Hence they stated it must for making a bomb.
They can’t win on this.
The more they decide to enrich for a power station or for medical reasons it will be seen as an attempt to enrich quicker and make a bomb.
If you know what I am trying to say.edit on 10-1-2012 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)
Read from the horse's mouth. They are admitting to achieve 20% uranium grade nuke. It's more than justifiable grade for peaceful nuke energy alone. Its not how many centrifugues they have to provide energy, its the nuke grade. And the horses themselves admitted in full on their own achievenment, not from outside sources or IAEA.
Originally posted by HellstormRising
reply to post by Brasov
Let me be clear. Regardless of what any international law says there is no such thing as Free Trade. It was an agreement that the world understood to globalize the economy.
Economic Sanctions can be legally tendered from any country depending on what forms they take. The sanctions that they are talking about is that if you buy from Iran we won't buy from you. They are not talking about blockades, or sinking ships, yet. Remember there are many different forms of sanctions and you need to be careful with generalizations. Once it gets to that point there are legalities in the international law and treaties that can make it bad bad news for whoever does the Military Sanctions or takes the Economic Sanctions to the level of blocking ports and thruways.
Originally posted by mkgandhas
for a nuke 90% should be u-235... so how like 20% will do. Impossible.
Originally posted by Brasov
Perhaps tomorrow you'll murder your wife and children, therefore you should be locked up today, or better yet, executed.
You're as fallacious as a crooked cop's speed trap.edit on 10-1-2012 by Brasov because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3Iran is peaceful,
Originally posted by Brasov
Go tell 1 million murdered iraqi civilians about legalities and the U.S.
Iran is not Iraq, it knows how to deal with international pirates on its shores and abroad.edit on 10-1-2012 by Brasov because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101Who died and made you king here that you feel obligated to attack other viewpoints than your own offensively?
Originally posted by Brasov
Actually Iran is a threat to other countries, they've invaded someone 300 years ago.
In contrast the U.S. is a peace maker, they've humanitarily bombed and invaded 3 countries since 2003. They' ve also bombed more then 100 countries and territories in the 20th century alone causing more than 6 million civilian deaths.
Conclusion: trust the peace-loving americans, Iran is the bad guy for defending its sovereign territory, everybody knows the U.S. have the right to their oil.
Originally posted by HellstormRisingIran is using uranium for its power generation and enriching it far beyond that of typical power generation, medical use, or even experimentation processes.