It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So you pick and choose what/who to believe.
Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
So you pick and choose what/who to believe.
Pretty sure most everyone is guilty of that.
The fact that it was on Fox News (a massive news organization owned by Rupert) would be enough for me to not trust what they say.
Yet you trust the fact that Fox News was indicating that contrails are chemtrails, and chemtrails are part of cloud seeding. Again, how can you cherry-pick what you believe on Fox news (or any news -- or any source, for that matter)?
Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
Usually when someone wants to adamantly convince you that something does not exist .......it means the topic in question probably does exist.
Most of all ..... I am biased because I have seen plenty in the sky to know something is up.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by Urantia1111
Oh you got me good there tiger! I'm sure its just my faulty memory, but I'm talking about the quality of these trails, not really the quantity. Why is it so important to you that people disregard this chemtrail idea as pure fiction?
...And what quality would that be?
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Urantia1111
Why is it so important to you that people disregard this chemtrail idea as pure fiction?
Because it is pure fiction.
It also, as a demonstrably fictitious belief, causes damage by wasting people's time and effort...."worrying" about something that isn't even happening, when there are a lot of other legitimate concerns to "worry" over.
If you want to better understand why the jet contrails look differently than they did 20-30 years ago, then go out and do some studying up about high bypass turbofan engines, and compare them to the older, and just about nowhere-in-use today, low bypass types of turbofan engines.
And, in terms of the way the contrails form, you will also see why there are similarities in some ways to the big, heavy bombers of World War 2, and their contrails.
It has to do with airflow patterns that surround and envelope the hot, humid exhaust gases.....the old propeller engines had BIG propellers....and modern high bypass turbofan jet engines also have a type of "propeller" out front, supplying the majority of the engine's thrust, and pushing a LOT of air....cooler, ambient temperature air.....aft and around the central core of hot gases.
I fail to see how burning of kerosene in the atmosphere could/would go from a quickly dissapating/evaporating trail to a miles long permenant cloud that blocks out the sun 5 days a week.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Late to the party here. But that was clearly stock footage of contrails.
You don't get stock footage of cloud seeding from the ground, because it just looks like a tiny little plane flying in a cloud.edit on 10-1-2012 by Uncinus because: (no reason given)
The least probable is Poisoning all of us (even though negative side-effects might occur)edit on 10-1-2012 by dplum517 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
Really? Like you cannot tell the difference? You must either live in some Magic Land that never sees these airborne abominations, or you never go outside and look up.
[snip]
Chemtrails are very real, and very distinguishable from contrails. Chemtrails don't evaporate, contrails do.
The fact is they are doing it.
the fact is they are doing it.
Are we going to sit here and debate contrail vs chemtrail when it doesnt really matter how where or when they do it?
I could care less what cloud seeding looks like or how they do it. The fact is its real and been real for some time.
Korea fires missles from the back of flatbed trucks at the clouds for their version of cloud seeding.
So it doesnt really matter what it looks like because their are many deployment methods.
Originally posted by Foxy1
Does it really matter what it looks like when they do it or how they do it?
The fact is they are doing it
When the pro contrail people see stuff like this they start grasping for straws about the nature of contrails what they look like what altitude crap like that.
I could care less what cloud seeding looks like or how they do it. The fact is its real and been real for some time.
Originally posted by Foxy1
reply to post by ProudBird
........ this is a thread where its whole conversation is based off a fox news story about cloudseeding...or am I on the wrong thread?
it seems you take great importance over millions of people debating contrail vs chemtrail. Well I dont care about the differences between a contrail and a chemtrail like millions of people do.
Originally posted by Foxy1
Does it really matter what it looks like when they do it or how they do it?
The fact is they are doing it.