Real, or Hoax?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 07:09 AM
link   
So does it look less fake now?



[Edited on 8-5-2003 by Grendizer]




posted on May, 9 2003 @ 12:37 AM
link   



No expert either, but I think it looks fake.



posted on May, 9 2003 @ 12:30 PM
link   
I think it's swamp gas!



posted on May, 9 2003 @ 04:47 PM
link   


MS, what do you mean it looks like swamp gas??


[Edited on 11-5-2003 by ProudAmerican]



posted on May, 9 2003 @ 05:49 PM
link   
Its too distorted, must be fake.



posted on May, 9 2003 @ 08:47 PM
link   
I'm going with fake.



posted on May, 10 2003 @ 07:15 PM
link   
Grendizer is absolutely correct.

I can't believe you people call this fake because of the JPEG compression distortion around the image.

There is distortion because this is the result of reducing the quality of the image so that it is a smaller file size so that people with slow internet dont wait 10 minutes for a hi-res picture to load...

This is fake because it's a low quality JPEG? Please....



posted on May, 11 2003 @ 02:07 AM
link   
When it comes to capturing the paranormal etc. on camera, digital might be handy, but it proves nothing. I'd need to see the negative of this shot and the developed photo before making a judgement. (if a traditional camera was used)

I don't tend to dismiss or praise any image I see on the net, just take it for what it is. There are some fantastic fakes around and it's getting easier and easier to achieve. Fakes and hoaxes do have their place in this world. Keeps people on their toes and establishes an effective system of working out what is real and what isnt.

Just thought I'd add that.



posted on May, 14 2003 @ 02:07 AM
link   
Whether its real or fake is irrelevant. A UFO remember, does not have to be alien. Its origins should be the question here





new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join