It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Psychic's predictions for 2012 -- From 30 years ago. [CONFIRMED HOAX]

page: 12
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:20 PM

Originally posted by OleMB
Besides; don't worry what will happen. Concentrate on yourself this year, let go of your fears, forgive yourself and your family, stop asking 'why me?' and start asking 'why NOT me?'. Love yourself and love others. Be at service to others, and let the plan unfold

edit on 10-1-2012 by OleMB because: (no reason given)

Best Post Ever.

I've been trying to tell my friends this for a long time!

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
It really frightens me that anyone could watch even 10 seconds of that and not be able to tell its made recently. I almost expected a laugh track.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
reply to post by Oceanios

What about his french accent and manner of speaking rather than his fashions which are arbitrary at best....his speech should tell you who he is or where hes from at least....
It looks pretty good french and gestures to match to me about it?(all i know are french canadians !)ey

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
Kodak Carousel box on shelf in the back of the room on right side -- perfect time for 1980

Here is am image from early 80's vintage (I used to have alot of these)

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
My vote is FAKE.

There's a dog that comes up in the video and sniffs around the guys leg. Dogs weren't invented until 1987.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
I agree on the fake part. It looks like a movie set, planting one '80's piece' as 'evidence' but then they forget to use a real clock (look at it, it says 8:20 in the beginning and 6 minutes later it's still the same time).
The actor is acting, his body language, looking away from the camera, that's not natural.

And the video looks too good for a 1980's video tape. They may have added some film grain, but in 1080p it looks just too perfect and new.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:23 PM

Originally posted by GLontra
If this video was for real, it would have become an instant success in 2001, after the 911 attacks.

The fact that this video wasn't made public until now, is the proof that it's fake.

Even if it didn't get the viral status from the 9/11 attacks it certainly would have achieved that status leading up to the 2008 election, or almost certainly after Obama was elected.


Also, this has probably been mentioned .. but, the broken clock is a dead give away. Check a watch ad in a magazine or look at a clock on a sitcom. A lot of the time they're set to 10:10 or 8:20. People like symmetric angles and these two times provide an appealing aspect to viewers. The clock in the video is stopped at 8:20.
edit on 10-1-2012 by tyranny22 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:26 PM
reply to post by SolidGoal

Well the screen capture of the old man with the lady with the white dress on behind him is definatly from the 1980's. Just look at those shoulder pads on the white dress! Can anyone say Joan Collins.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:27 PM

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by RUSSO

The resolution is too high for the time period.

It is a fake.

How do you know the resolution is too high? It may be fake, i think it can be real just from judging it on a small youtube clip alone. Could be from a well preserved broadcast master tape. Dont forget that cameras dont only rely on resolution alone but also the lens plays a big part in the image quality.

Ever watch BBC shows from the 80s? They are high quality, not HD but very good.
edit on 10-1-2012 by Malcher because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:27 PM
I have to agree with Audiokat-

The dog is the key to this whole video and if you look close enough, you can clearly see the dog was a photoshop addition.

Debunked, nice job auidiokat! S+F!

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:28 PM

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:28 PM

Originally posted by hopeisasound
I have to agree with Audiokat-

The dog is the key to this whole video and if you look close enough, you can clearly see the dog was a photoshop addition.

Debunked, nice job auidiokat! S+F!

Star for you.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:33 PM

Originally posted by strato
Any proof it was actually recorded 30 years ago?

Actually I was going to say that too! Stuff from even the 90's still can look dated and this is supposedly from 1982? I don't think so...

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:34 PM
This to me seems pathetically staged. I mean, why the deliberate angle? The camera isn't facing him. It's off to the left so to be sure to include the 'vintage' chair and albums.

Also, in the 6-minutes of this video, the 'vintage' clock never moves. It stays at 8:20
So I am concluding everything we see are props. From his glasses to the thumb tacks in the chair.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:35 PM

Originally posted by NowanKenubi
"Je suis venu m'installer en Californie parce qu'en faite, euh.. dans mon village en France, euh, on m'appelait "Le Devin". Je faisais beaucoup de révélations, euh, et notamment une qui s'est avérée exacte.
Donc, j'n'en parlerai pas ici, puisque c'est pas le propos...
Et il a vraiment fallu que je quitte le pays et maintenant depuis 20 ans, je suis installé ici, en Californie et... et j'm'y sens bien.
Non, non non, non non non, ce serait vraiment de la science-fiction, non non, non non, je suis quelqu'un qui travaille avec les images.
Donc là, j'ai vu un homme, sur la lune, hum... marcher sur la lune, euh arrivant avec une fusée!
Voilà, je m'rapelle que c'était en 1950, j'avais, j'avais à peine 10, donc, euh, on a donc l'imaginaire de son âge...
Donc une fusée, un homme, marchant sur la lune, et je disais toujours à mes parents; 'On va aller sur la lune en 1969".
On va, et alors ça s'est avéré, évidemment... Ils étaient à la fois touchés alors, je pense, quant s'a s'est révélé...

Oui, j'ai toujours des... des images, euh, notamment, euh, des images très très forte notamment en ce qui concerne en faite la... l'énergie nucléaire, puisque nous arrivons vers la fin de l'énergie du pétrole, euh, on a bien là, ce qui s'est passé ces dernières années... et donc on va vers l'énergie nucléaire, et là, l'énergie nucléaire apportera sont lot de catastrophes, notamment, euh, en URSS, où je prédis pour la fin de la décennie, avant la fin de la décennie, euh, n'est ce pas, une... une catastrophe majeure qui pourra remettre en question l'utilisation mëme du nucléaire.

On va avoir des voitures électriques, hum, et ça très rapidement, au tour des années, je pense 2000, 2000 qui est mon année fétiche, euh, 2000-2005, les voitures à pétrole n'existeront plus. On sera sur les voitures électriques, hum...
Et je pense qu'on aura, si ce n'est pas commercialisé, en tout cas, euh, trouver la solution de la voiture volante, la voiture magnétique, voilà. Je le vois tout à fait très clairement.

C'est relativement flou, mais en tout cas, ce qui est relativement certain, c'est que dans la première décennie qui suivra l'an 2000, euh... L'Amérique sera attaquée.
Non, non non, non non, il ne s'agit pas de, d'une attaque à l'étranger, mais d'une attaque sur le sol américain.
Il s'agit d'un, là, vraiment, d'un nouveau Pearl Harbor, euh... C'est un bombardement!... Et je vois des villes, comme Los Angeles, notamment New-York se faire bombarder, New-York se faire bombarder, euh, et ce dans la première décennie qui suivra l'an 2000... voilà, ça, euh, s'est évident.

Non, non non, mais comme je vous disais, le Bloc de l'Est dans 10 ans n'existera quasiment plus et donc on peut imaginer qu'a l'aube de l'an 2000 non seulement ils seront des alliés mais en plus de ça, euh, on ne parlera plus, je veux dire on ne parlera plus de Bloc Soviétique, euh non, non non!

Là c'est... c'est très très claire, les causes de, de ces attaques et les causes de ce conflit, seront d'abord, euh, liés à l'énergie, ça c'est évident, de l'énergie, le pétrole, la guerre du pétrole va rentrer bientôt en action, dans pas longtemps, et deuxièmement, euh, le problème est une guerre de religions, on revient sur les guerres de religions, hum, oui, et euh, et euh,un changement qui, qui sera une révolution populaire,euh, populaire, puisque le peuple américain, euh, élira, entre 2005 et 2012, euh, c'est très clair là encore, un noir à la tête du pays le plus puissant du monde. Un noir sera, euh, l'homme le plus puissant du monde. Hum... Et... et ce sera, euh, amené par un élan populaire, vraiment... Les gens, euh, seront derrière cet homme qui sera accueilli probalement, euh,euh, non pas comme un messie, mais en tout cas, euh,comme un, comme un... un sauveur, l'esprit d'un changement pour un, euh, une amérique qui aura souffert, je pense."


That's the retranscription of the first 4:19 seconds. It took longer than I thought, and I have to go make the supper... Will be back later for the end where he adresses the world in a hundred years from now, talking about 2012, as the year of contact, or rather, invasion, in a war like manner, almost...

Anyway, I'll be back later. Sorry for mistakes. I tried to put everything, even all his euhs and hums...

Here from google translate:

I moved to California because, in fact, uh .. in my village in France, uh, I was called "The Soothsayer". I made many revelations, uh, especially one that has proven accurate.
So j'n'en say nothing here, since it is not about ...
And really I had to leave the country for 20 years and now I am settled here in California and ... j'm'y and feel good.
No, no, no, no no no, it would be really science fiction, no no, no no, I am someone who works with images.
So there, I saw a man on the moon, uh ... walk on the moon, uh arriving with a rocket!
There, I m'rapelle it was in 1950, I, I was just 10, so um, it has the imagination of his age ...
So a rocket, a man walking on the moon, and I always told my parents, 'We'll go to the moon in 1969. "
We will, and so it proved, of course ... They were both affected when I think about S'A proved ...

Yes, I always ... images, uh, in particular, um, very, very strong images in particular concerned so ... nuclear energy, as we come towards the end of petroleum energy, uh, was there, what happened in recent years ... and so it goes to nuclear energy, and there will be nuclear energy share of disasters, including, uh, in the USSR, where I predict the end of the decade, before the end of the decade, uh, no is not it, a ... a major disaster that will challenge even the use of nuclear power.

We will have electric cars, um, and it very quickly, the turn of the year, I think 2000, 2000 which is my favorite year, um, 2000-2005, oil cars no longer exist. It will be on electric cars, hum ...
And I think we will if it is not marketed, anyway, uh, the solution of the flying car, car magnetic, here. I see quite clearly.

It is relatively vague, but in any case which is relatively certain is that in the first decade following the 2000, um ... America will be attacked.
No, no, no, no no, it is not, an attack abroad, but an attack on American soil.
This is one there, really, a new Pearl Harbor, uh ... It's a bombing! ... And I see cities like Los Angeles, including New York being bombed, New York being bombed, uh, within the first decade following the year 2000 ... Here, it's, uh, was obvious.

No, no, no, but as I said, the Eastern Bloc in 10 years are almost over and so one can imagine that at the beginning of 2000 they will not only allies but also of that, uh, we no longer speak, I mean we no longer speak of the Soviet Bloc, uh no, no no!

Here is ... it is very clear, the causes of these attacks and the causes of this conflict will be first, uh, energy-related, it is obvious, energy, oil, war Oil will soon go into action in no time, and second, uh, the problem is a war of religions, we return to the religious wars, um, yes, and uh, and uh, a change that will be a popular revolution, uh, popular since the American people, uh, shall elect, from 2005 to 2012, um, it's very clear again, a black head of the most powerful country in the world. Black is, uh, the most powerful man in the world. Hmm ... Et .. and it will be, uh, brought by a mass movement, really ... People, uh, will be behind this man to be hosted Probal, uh, uh, not a messiah, but in any case, uh, like a, like a ... a savior, the spirit of a change for a, uh, an America that has suffered, I think. "

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:37 PM
This reminds me of the 2012 alien invasion talked about in the x-files! Maybe it's a campaign for an up coming x-files movie about the 2012 alien invasion?

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:41 PM

Someone thinks they can judge resolution on the internet?

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:42 PM
Problem is that the 80's stuff used in the set was too well staged, the projector box was the most obvious imho. It was in the set designed to make it look 1980, but it was obviously well aged even though it was very current tech circa 1980... nice try. IMHO the alien encounter will happen and school humanity, But i am sure they will try to hoax it as well- i saw a badly faked UFO (READ: Silent helicopter retrofitted with LED light panels) last night flying past the moon.

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:43 PM
Hmm first thing I thought when i saw the still from the vid that prefaces the imbedded video... was the same as what quite a few others think also.

That looks a hell of a lot like some one trying to make a video that looks like its from the 80's when it isnt...

Its the guys glasses that make me uneasy for some reason. They scream "im trying to be intelligent and retro 80's but over compensating into cliche!". Also it seems oddly off, as some one that grew up in the 80's im used to the way it looked with things like TV and Video back then and this looks 'wrong' on a subconscious level to me.

I call hoax.

edit on 10-1-2012 by BigfootNZ because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:44 PM
looks like a hoax to me, old video filters or actual old cameras are easy to access, and like another poster said, his acting abilities are not the best, a nameless actor on youtube isn't a source anyone should take seriously.

new topics

top topics

<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in