It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If cleaning carbon dioxide from the atmosphere was easy, we’d already be doing it. But carbon capture has proven to be a tough technology to feasibly roll out on a grand scale, and that means all the things we do that produce carbon dioxide emissions--which seems to be just about everything these days--are still roughly as bad for the planet as they were several years ago. That’s a problem in a warming world, and one that a team of researchers may have just found a solution for via an inexpensive polymeric material.
I was wondering how the extracted CO2 would be sequestered, but the article doesn't say:
Originally posted by Daedal
Source / Alternative source
Even if it's extracted, and sequestering is as simple as pumping it into a storage tank, how many storage tanks will we need to have any impact?
After capturing carbon, the material also gives it up easily so it can be sequestered or recycled through the manufacture of other substances.
After capturing carbon dioxide, the materials give it up easily so that the CO2 can be used in making other substances, or permanently isolated from the environment.
Their tests showed that these inexpensive materials achieved some of the highest carbon dioxide removal rates ever reported for humid air, under conditions that stymie other related materials. After capturing carbon dioxide, the materials give it up easily so that the CO2 can be used in making other substances, or permanently isolated from the environment. The capture material then can be recycled and reused many times over without losing efficiency.
Originally posted by Flatfish
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Could always convert it to dry ice and drop into the frozen depths of the ocean or take it somewhere like Antarctica where it should be just fine, unless the earth's poles relocate.
Who starred your post?
Originally posted by Flatfish
Could always convert it to dry ice and drop into the frozen depths of the ocean or take it somewhere like Antarctica where it should be just fine, unless the earth's poles relocate.
Good idea. The only problem I see with that is, the supply of CO2 to have any significant effect on the Earth would far exceed the demand by farmers. But if we could find many other uses, that could definitely be one of them.
Originally posted by Daedal
How about giving it to hydroponic farmers to utilize for food production...
On the contrary, it takes energy to make frozen CO2.
Originally posted by sweetnlow
you could use the frozen Co2(dry ice) to make energy, just like you use heat to produce steam
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I was wondering how the extracted CO2 would be sequestered, but the article doesn't say:
Originally posted by Daedal
Source / Alternative source
Even if it's extracted, and sequestering is as simple as pumping it into a storage tank, how many storage tanks will we need to have any impact?
After capturing carbon, the material also gives it up easily so it can be sequestered or recycled through the manufacture of other substances.
However, this is interesting news, thanks for sharing it.