It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The word here translated, work, in the Greek version, means business, so it is not about a thing he made as a work but His employment, so to speak, which is divine judge, not so much, maker.
Deuteronomy 32:4
He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.
This above or God creates evil things that are not perfect.
Your choice.
Jesus would have been constrained and only allowed to do what the eternal spirit (whatever that is) permitted him to do, which was spiritual things, and not things in the physical realm where he could have prevented the flood. So Jesus would have been allowed to offer the people of the time an opportunity to repent of their sinfulness.
If Jesus visited Noah, Noah would have never built or finished the ark.
Jesus would have told him to do unto others. If one is doing with others in mind, he would never build something that would facilitate the genocide of man. Noah would have done the right thing and told God where to shove his genocidal fit and to do the right thing and cure instead of kill those he thought defective, exactly like a Jesus character would do.
I do not know if God is real.
I don't remember making an agreement, or coming to a certain understanding, before coming into existence and I don't think that even makes sense that you agree to something before you exist.
No soul is bigger or better than any other and we all agree on this reality before we incarnate here.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by berenike
I don't remember making an agreement, or coming to a certain understanding, before coming into existence and I don't think that even makes sense that you agree to something before you exist.
No soul is bigger or better than any other and we all agree on this reality before we incarnate here.
I would imagine that once you do exist, there is an option available to not exist but I would also imagine that for a majority of the population of souls, there would be a natural inclination to continue to exist regardless of the circumstances.
I may also have to accept the concept that there are people who have no interest in existing and would be happy to be annihilated and their very memory of ever existing be forgotten and to let someone else use that energy or whatever that had given them life up till now.
Of course I do not buy into that sort of thinking because I do not believe in their being a shortage of raw materiel to make souls to where we somehow need to pass on that potential. And I find the very idea completely ridiculous.
edit on 13-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
You missed out the part where I said that the soul was eternal - existing for eternity. 'Before' and 'after' it incarnates here.
I have my doubts about that. I think those are Medieval additions that people think is just part of the package and have not gotten around to question or are afraid it would be loosing faith.
A person who believes in the christian god has decided that their one god creates everything.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I have my doubts about that. I think those are Medieval additions that people think is just part of the package and have not gotten around to question or are afraid it would be loosing faith.
Most people are "hazy" but I think you get the general idea. Most Christians don't realize they are followers of the beast's religion and don't even know what the original Christianity was about.
As I've said, this isn't really my thing, I'm hazy on the finer details, but the early christians appeared to be a bit more bolshie and prepared to challenge the ruling class than the majority of them are now.
Originally posted by Theophorus
reply to post by Greatest I am
I think you have it all wrong.God doesn't give you a choice.he gives you the right to choose. A tyrant would not give the right to choose. There are only two choices. Self and God. What other choices could there be?
Originally posted by berenike
reply to post by Greatest I am
I didn't want to bait someone who had explained their sincerely held belief to me, but to go back to the point of God deciding in his omnipotence whether or not he wanted to be omnipresent.
I made a light-hearted answer but I thought a bit more about it afterwards.
God's omnipresence appears to be something that christians pretty much rely on - after all they expect him to watch over them and to hear when they say their prayers.
If, in his omnipotence he has decided against being omnipresent then he has become unreliable. How will they know that he is ever watching? He might have turned his attentions elsewhere completely.
The way the God has been structured makes some of the beliefs almost indefensible unless you twist logic - but there always seems to be an answer for everything. It's just that the answers very often suit or satisfy the person who is expressing their belief and few other people.
I'm not an atheist - more of a polytheist, and have found a logic and consistency in other beliefs that I just find missing in a religion that denies any sort of duality. It's hard to fathom a god who, it is claimed, is only good, knows everything and there is only one of him when everywhere around us we can see cruelty and evil.
But that's ok, we can blame it on a devil who, after all, is a creation of god. And who can come here to tempt us all to sin so that we can end up in eternal hell. Where it's his duty to punish us - for something he made us do?
But that's ok - we had free-will, provided by a god who surely understands our weaknesses since he created us, so it's our own fault if that's where we end up?
And to re-iterate the point we agree on: free will or not Joe Public relies on his lords and masters to teach him the way of things. If they're corrupt and only teach him what suits them how can he be expected to fathom out the Truth for himself - we're all pretty much 'victims' or our environment, any available education system and those around us. If god chooses not to present himself in a burning bush for all those who are being poorly taught his ways it's extremely immoral to judge us and condemn us to hell if we got it wrong.
Beginning to see here how we're made in god's image. Explains a lot about human nature
Anyway, no disrespect intended to anyone here.
edit on 12-1-2012 by berenike because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by icepack
reply to post by Greatest I am
the soul is said to enter the human body at birth and leaves at death. there was an experiment, where scientists were weighing a dieing person and the weight was reduced by a couple of gramms when death occured. the soul seems to have actual mass.
edit on 12-1-2012 by icepack because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
Opportunities may arise where you are presented with other gods to place yourself under and this is where we should have an ability not to.
You definitively say that God gave free will and that nothing is impossible for him.
Is this first hand information, just hearsay and bible say or just the way you want it?
God is supposed to be un-fathomable.
How is it that you or anyone can fathom what you said about him?
This is "Bible say".
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
The point is that God was surprised and found iniquity where he himself must have created it.
Right, your main point was a counter to an earlier post claiming God can not be surprised, so I am nit-picking here, but I feel I need to to keep things straight in a general sort of way, and not just to "win" an argument but to be educational for others who may read this thread.
If we look at this passage in Ezekiel to mean Adam, we can discuss him, and his sin was to listen to his wife rather than to follow what The Lord had told him.
Scriptures say that God created all things for his pleasure.
He then must have created that iniquity in the first place.
Scripturally speaking, God likes iniquity and it pleases him to see it at work.
Satan was rewarded remember and so was Adam.
The Jews see Eden as man's elevation so iniquity must be good.
I was taught a specific version of this story in my church, where Adam was off somewhere and Eve was left alone, while the serpent took this opportunity to seduce her with demonstrations of how nice to look at the fruit was and even having the serpent eat some in front of her to show how it did no harm to him. She eventually became convinced, then ate some and was already doomed before Adam returned to discover this dreadful situation. Once he realized she was going to die, out of love for her, he decided he should go with her to whatever place she was going to. So it is really a tragic love story according to this romantic version popular in my church.
But looking at the actual text, there is nothing to indicate that they were anything other than side by side the whole time.
But, still it could be a love story but a love triangle between Adam loving Eve and The Lord loving Adam and having Eve messing up a great relationship they had before she was around, sitting around naming animals and discussing the universe and everything. So The Lord is a jilted ********** lover as the story plays out.
* possibly offensive word self-censored by authoredit on 12-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Greatest I am
The word here translated, work, in the Greek version, means business, so it is not about a thing he made as a work but His employment, so to speak, which is divine judge, not so much, maker.
Deuteronomy 32:4
He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.
This above or God creates evil things that are not perfect.
Your choice.edit on 12-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)