2012? False.We are actually living in the year 2000

page: 8
16
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 03:47 AM
link   
reply to post by black0h
 



How do you measure without a defined zero point
We have defined point zero,the year 0.




posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Xterrain
 



This thread is retarded.

Truth is...no one knows what year it is.
It's a contradiction in your words.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 03:56 AM
link   
reply to post by woogleuk
 



If we have lost 12 years over 2000 years, surely at some point winter would have been summer and vice versa....
You don't understand,this is not from physical point of view.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 03:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by woogleuk
 



What does it matter?
Hard to explain to you...very hard,believe me.But in the Bible is written very clear,
" year 2000 not will come nor will pass"




Say what? Which bible? Did it come from Bob's Bargain Basement of Biblical Translations? The "mix n match" bin? I'm gonna need chapter and verse on that one.

Here's how the calendar works: the Earth rotates 365.2422 days for every complete revolution around the sun. Every 4 revolutions around the sun, we add those extra .24 rotations all together and call them a "leap day" to bring everything back into alignment.

There is NO "2,19 days per year loss".

Nope. It don't happen.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:00 AM
link   
reply to post by thegrayone
 



I, also, read in the bible where it says that the year 2000 will not come nor pass. Of course, it doesn't say the year 2000 literally. One has to have an open mind to know how to interpret it and see it for what it was meant to be. It is right there in the bible... right there!
You have a open mind and I am glad you understand my point it's all a theoretical and spiritual assumption,as about your question I cannot give an answer,if we have this answer there will be now end.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:02 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


Did you do this reply so it would appear in my inbox forcing me back here to this pointless argument?

I have explained to you why you are wrong, you have avoided giving us the mathematics of your argument, you are not going to be shown the light, therefore I chose to abandon all hope for you.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Jedite
 



Seriously this has six pages? Why are we arguing with the troll
Why don't you burn me,like they did with Giordano Bruno?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Mads1987
 



Why must anyone prove you wrong, when you have yet to prove anything yourself? But, I noticed that this guy already proved you wrong.
Sorry but I don't see any proof that what I am saying is wrong in your words.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:10 AM
link   
reply to post by woogleuk
 



I chose to abandon all hope for you.
at list I will not get insulted again so I am glad you did that.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
Hard to explain to you...very hard,believe me.But in the Bible is written very clear,
" year 2000 not will come nor will pass"


Should have known, another lunatic escaped the asylum.

Batman, I think it's time to block off 90% of the world. Arkham City is getting to crowded



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Taz2122
 



Should have known, another lunatic escaped the asylum.
Not even v'been there yet.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:16 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


.
LOL, 'Yet'!

Man your choice of music listed in your sig sucks.
/offtopic
.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:20 AM
link   
reply to post by snewpers
 



Man your choice of music listed in your sig sucks
not discuss tastes



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by ColAngus
 



Where....in the Bible
I stated that before.



No, you didn't. NOWHERE have you stated where the bible says this.

NOWHERE.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by InsideYourMind
 



"2000" will never come or go? Explain how that makes sense
Because we expect the Apocalypse in 2000 and didn't come,but we are in 2000(2012),and we expect something to come and probably will come,not knowing that we are actually in the year 2000,so because that didn't happened in 2000 and for that is why we don't believe in the prophecy of the Bible.Not will come nor will go.

The bible prophesy says the year 2000 "not will come nor will go". You are saying the year 2000 has come and proved the bible prophesy wrong?



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Observor
 



The bible prophesy says the year 2000 "not will come nor will go". You are saying the year 2000 has come and proved the bible prophesy wrong?
No I am saying that the year 2000 is in between 2102 and 2000( "not will come nor will go"),meaning the year 2012 which is 2000.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:32 AM
link   
reverse math!

So you stick in to your mind that we are a 2000, therefore you calculated the days that we lost...like this:
12x365 = 4380(days) »»»» 4380/2000= 2.19. (days)
so from year 0 to today you add 2.19 day and you get 2012 ...neet (:

and by this you sustain your theory but can't explain how do we loose 2,19 in year




posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:34 AM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


No I am saying that the year 2000 is in between 2102 and 2000( "not will come nor will go"),meaning the year 2012 which is 2000.

If you are saying this is the year 2000, it means it has come although it hasn't gone. But the prophesy says the year 2000 will not come. So you are claiming the prophesy is wrong



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Observor
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


No I am saying that the year 2000 is in between 2102 and 2000( "not will come nor will go"),meaning the year 2012 which is 2000.

If you are saying this is the year 2000, it means it has come although it hasn't gone. But the prophesy says the year 2000 will not come. So you are claiming the prophesy is wrong


First.I am not referring to a prophecy I am referring to year it self,second the prophecies are for prophets.



posted on Jan, 10 2012 @ 04:41 AM
link   
reply to post by voyger2
 



how do we loose 2,19 in year
Define lose in your sentence,from theoretical point and from physical point.





top topics
 
16
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join