It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The IAEA may have been able to inspect it partially while it was still under construction in 2009, but it's my understanding that Iran hasn't let them back in there since
The diplomats said that centrifuges at the Fordo site near Iran's holy city of Qom are churning out uranium enriched to 20 percent.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
reply to post by Deetermined
Hey, the day we let the Ayatollah tour our nuclear facilities...
Then I will say America has the right to show up in any other country and start digging around.
As far as I am concerned, Iran was doing everything asked of them until the UN started taking it too far.
And as for a country with no advanced electronics...
You better do some serious research, Iran is just as advanced as we are.
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
i am aganst a war like most of yall on here but think about what i stated above^^^. what would happen of they did do something like that? where would the US be in a year after an oil field clearing event like that? would we be able to do any thing with a price of $7 or $8 bucks a gallon for gas? think about it and then think about if we should wait to see if they are building a nuclear bomb.
just a little something to think about, this might be the war we really need to pay attintion to.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: my spell check likes to spell words wrong, stupid spell checker
Originally posted by ShadowAngel85
Does anyone really believe, that Iran really is only interested in using nuclear power in a peaceful way? For what? For what does a country, that by all standards is behind times, without many fancy buildings or electronical devices, need so much energy?
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by jjf3rd77
I find it strange, how its now "confirmed".
Sounds like propoganda to me.
vvv
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
i am aganst a war like most of yall on here but think about what i stated above^^^. what would happen of they did do something like that? where would the US be in a year after an oil field clearing event like that? would we be able to do any thing with a price of $7 or $8 bucks a gallon for gas? think about it and then think about if we should wait to see if they are building a nuclear bomb.
just a little something to think about, this might be the war we really need to pay attintion to.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: my spell check likes to spell words wrong, stupid spell checker
We would open up our own American oil fields?
Or maybe *GASP* use the technology that was available in 1990 and not use oil for cars anymore? Oh wait... that's right...
The media has suckered you in to believing that America wouldn't be able to function without oil...
Newsflash... we only still use it because it's so profitable for the people that already own the companies...
In the 1970's an oil embargo against Brazil forced them to engineer and mass produce ethanol-based cars that ran off of sugarcane...
THAT WAS BRAZIL IN 1970!
I swear some of you are making me lose faith in this community this morning...
I need some coffee
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
i am aganst a war like most of yall on here but think about what i stated above^^^. what would happen of they did do something like that? where would the US be in a year after an oil field clearing event like that? would we be able to do any thing with a price of $7 or $8 bucks a gallon for gas? think about it and then think about if we should wait to see if they are building a nuclear bomb.
just a little something to think about, this might be the war we really need to pay attintion to.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: my spell check likes to spell words wrong, stupid spell checker
We would open up our own American oil fields?
Or maybe *GASP* use the technology that was available in 1990 and not use oil for cars anymore? Oh wait... that's right...
The media has suckered you in to believing that America wouldn't be able to function without oil...
Newsflash... we only still use it because it's so profitable for the people that already own the companies...
In the 1970's an oil embargo against Brazil forced them to engineer and mass produce ethanol-based cars that ran off of sugarcane...
THAT WAS BRAZIL IN 1970!
I swear some of you are making me lose faith in this community this morning...
I need some coffee
as of 2007 one-quarter of all the maize and other grain crops grown in the US now ends up as biofuel
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
i am aganst a war like most of yall on here but think about what i stated above^^^. what would happen of they did do something like that? where would the US be in a year after an oil field clearing event like that? would we be able to do any thing with a price of $7 or $8 bucks a gallon for gas? think about it and then think about if we should wait to see if they are building a nuclear bomb.
just a little something to think about, this might be the war we really need to pay attintion to.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: my spell check likes to spell words wrong, stupid spell checker
ok so we drop there oil and opt to go for green tech. thats all great but how long would that take to put in place, 1 year, 5 years or 10 years? if we started on it right now i think we might have something worth while in 5 years. im not talking about the every day driver im talking about farmers and truck drivers, the people who help keep this country rolling. i dont thing the farmers and truck drivers are going to stay in work while we wait for a new tech. to be put in place. hince a drop kick to the economy's face.
as fare as the media having me brain washed in to beleaving we need oil, lol. WE DO NEED OIL and thats the problem. how much oil used in a week in the usa about 143 million barrels. na we dont need oil.
ok lets make every car run off ethanol, we got that and they get worse mpg than reg. gas but its cheaper so inturn it evens it self out. sounds good, now how much farm land would we have to alocate to feed the hungry beast?
as of 2007 one-quarter of all the maize and other grain crops grown in the US now ends up as biofuel
link
that will continue as will the rise in food prices, fare trade off eh.
we use oil in every thing and i dont see us breaking our adiction any time soon.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: sorry my spell check is crap... need to find a new one till then bear with me
So what if it takes 5 years to convert over?
Why did we not start the process 10 years ago? or 30?
And no, petrol isn't the only thing oil is used for, but name something made from it, and let's see if we can't find an alternative.
Go ahead... I'll wait.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by NISMOALTI
i am aganst a war like most of yall on here but think about what i stated above^^^. what would happen of they did do something like that? where would the US be in a year after an oil field clearing event like that? would we be able to do any thing with a price of $7 or $8 bucks a gallon for gas? think about it and then think about if we should wait to see if they are building a nuclear bomb.
just a little something to think about, this might be the war we really need to pay attintion to.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: my spell check likes to spell words wrong, stupid spell checker
ok so we drop there oil and opt to go for green tech. thats all great but how long would that take to put in place, 1 year, 5 years or 10 years? if we started on it right now i think we might have something worth while in 5 years. im not talking about the every day driver im talking about farmers and truck drivers, the people who help keep this country rolling. i dont thing the farmers and truck drivers are going to stay in work while we wait for a new tech. to be put in place. hince a drop kick to the economy's face.
as fare as the media having me brain washed in to beleaving we need oil, lol. WE DO NEED OIL and thats the problem. how much oil used in a week in the usa about 143 million barrels. na we dont need oil.
ok lets make every car run off ethanol, we got that and they get worse mpg than reg. gas but its cheaper so inturn it evens it self out. sounds good, now how much farm land would we have to alocate to feed the hungry beast?
as of 2007 one-quarter of all the maize and other grain crops grown in the US now ends up as biofuel
link
that will continue as will the rise in food prices, fare trade off eh.
we use oil in every thing and i dont see us breaking our adiction any time soon.edit on 9-1-2012 by NISMOALTI because: sorry my spell check is crap... need to find a new one till then bear with me
So what if it takes 5 years to convert over?
Why did we not start the process 10 years ago? or 30?
And no, petrol isn't the only thing oil is used for, but name something made from it, and let's see if we can't find an alternative.
Go ahead... I'll wait.
Not a chemist, but can you produce paraffins or Alkyenes from other material other than Crude?
Originally posted by superman2012
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by jjf3rd77
I find it strange, how its now "confirmed".
Sounds like propoganda to me.
vvv
The only thing that is "confirmed" is that they are enriching more than previously thought. There is NO CONFIRMATION of nuclear weapons. MSM and western propaganda.
Originally posted by ShadowAngel85
The double standards on this website sure are funny. "It's from an american source, so it's all lies". "It's from a non-american source, so it can only be true".
Does anyone really believe, that Iran really is only interested in using nuclear power in a peaceful way? For what? For what does a country, that by all standards is behind times, without many fancy buildings or electronical devices, need so much energy?
One must be really naive, to think that Iran isn't interested in building nuclear weapons, even if (and with all those maniacs leading the country, it's a really big IF) they just want them to protect themselves from those evil, evil infidels
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
reply to post by Britguy
20% is the high-end limit for 'safe' uranium, for use in research reactors and such. Anything over this is mainly for weapons.
Even at 20% you could make a nasty bomb that would obliterate a large town.
You either believe Iran stops enrichment at 20% or you don't...edit on 9-1-2012 by FOXMULDER147 because: (no reason given)