Homeland Security monitors journalists, page 1

Homeland Security monitors journalists

rt.com

According to the Department of Homeland Security’s own definition of personal identifiable information, or PII, such data could consist of any intellect “that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information which is linked or linkable to that individual.” Previously established guidelines within the administration say that data could only be collected under authorization set forth by written code, but the new provisions in the NOC’s write-up means that any reporter, whether someone along the lines of Walter Cronkite or a budding bl

(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
White House: Need to monitor online 'extremism'

The wording is insanely confusing under National Operations Center (NOC)’s Media Monitoring Initiative is just the start how soon until they are censoring journalist's for what they are saying or reporting?

what is more alarming is they are coming right out and saying it now when they have been doing this since 2010.

I dont know how much longer the Dept of homeland security can get away with this more and more its like they are turning into the early stages of hitlers homeland security.

and with obama giving his full support to SOPA and NDAA I am starting to fear the coming elections.


rt.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply to post by -W1LL

---

Hey, it's for your safety dude. You don't want journalists publishing things that threaten our national security, do you? Otherwise, the terrorists might get you. What if a journalist was really recruiting Jihadist martyrs to commit terrorist actions against the US? Homeland Security would be there to save the day.

I would gladly destroy the entire Bill of Rights and literally put it in law that the Constitution is null and void as long as I can feel safe from the Al-CIAda terrorists.

reply to post by TupacShakur

---

I would gladly destroy the entire Bill of Rights and literally put it in law that the Constitution is null and void as long as I can feel safe from the Al-CIAda terrorists

are these your own words?

do you feel threatened in any way that you feel safe knowing and seeing the DHS working to keep you safe. my point is can you prove anybody or group is keeping you safe. and why would you give up your right to protect your own self or family and depend on another group or organization to keep you or family safe. I just dont get where you come from..

I am safe because I say so, because I do so..because of my choice to be safe..and because I was a soldier, I think like a soldier therefore I am my own and my families soldier

reply to post by rebellender

---

That was all sarcasm bro. I thought for sure including "Al-CIAda" in there would make it pretty clear.

Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by -W1LL

---

Hey, it's for your safety dude. You don't want journalists publishing things that threaten our national security, do you? Otherwise, the terrorists might get you. What if a journalist was really recruiting Jihadist martyrs to commit terrorist actions against the US? Homeland Security would be there to save the day.

I would gladly destroy the entire Bill of Rights and literally put it in law that the Constitution is null and void as long as I can feel safe from the Al-CIAda terrorists.

I couldn't agree more. I think the Bill of Rights is obsolete. When our founding fathers were around, they could never invision terrorism, or 2 planes knocking down 3 buildings(lack of imagination). They wouldn't even know what a plane was, so clearly we need more security or I'm afraid the final proof could come in the form of a MUSHROOM CLOUD.

I'm not sure why I post on this site seeing as I don't believe in any conspiracy theories and only come here to visit the 911 forums and debunk truthers... but you know, this thread really stood out.

It stood out as a beacon of freedom. A beacon of security. Because security and freedom go hand in hand.

ATS really needs to WAKE UP, talking about Ron Paul this, and Ron Paul that. His foreign policy is CRAZY. You actually think NOT attacking foreign countries is a good idea??? WTH?!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by -W1LL

---

Hey, it's for your safety dude. You don't want journalists publishing things that threaten our national security, do you? Otherwise, the terrorists might get you. What if a journalist was really recruiting Jihadist martyrs to commit terrorist actions against the US? Homeland Security would be there to save the day.

I would gladly destroy the entire Bill of Rights and literally put it in law that the Constitution is null and void as long as I can feel safe from the Al-CIAda terrorists.

Oh, those pesky Constitution and Bill of Rights! Indeed. We will be SOOO safe without them! I WANT to be told what to do when. I will be so safe and cozy.

Freedom? Meh. Who wants THAT!?! Only a sicko.

Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 94 member flags

Blatant Corruption Exposed as EU Blocks France\'s Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO Maize
  Posted 5 days ago with 84 member flags

Iraq and Afghanistan veterans to return their medals to protest war on terror at Chicago NATO summit
  Posted 13 days ago with 82 member flags

Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 8 days ago with 73 member flags

Electricity generated from water: BlackLight Power announces validation of its scientific breakthrou
  Posted 6 days ago with 65 member flags

Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags

Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags

BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 53 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: