Originally posted by Daedal
The "bomb" which had no explosives...
The article speaks of electronic detectors, and the use of sniffer dogs (about 30 right now, they say).
If there were no explosives in the fake, then they can hardly be expected to have detected it now, can they?
To me this seems about as useful as doing a drug test on people who never take drugs, and declaring the test useless because they didnt find anything.
Of course not.


