It's Heading Right Toward Earth!!!!!!!

reply to post by RMFX1


No the shapes, on all 3 pictures have the same outline. I don't see that in the photo produced. Use the pink thing in the middle as a point of reference.

Originally posted by Manhater
reply to post by RMFX1

 

No the shapes, on all 3 pictures have the same outline. I don't see that in the photo produced. Use the pink thing in the middle as a point of reference.

Different cameras, different sensors flipping out in very slightly different ways, there's no denying that it is very similar. You can see my edited post on the previous page for reference.

Reply to post by tallcool1

Are you sure we're fine?


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by RMFX1


Well, mine is not as magnified as yours. I just worked on both of your images and neither one of them came to the same image. Sorry.

I've looked at the sun through a welding helmet before ( only use the kind that are already darkened), and didn't see anything coming. Probably way too dark to take a picture through.

It was very interesting though.

Originally posted by ColAngus

Originally posted by Manhater

[Tapping] ....prove your lens flare theory....please. I'm waiting... [patiently] Please let it be sometime soon, and not eons later.

Go through this thread I posted earlier (try page 8):

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Another member does a great job of showing why it's lens flare.

edit on 9-1-2012 by ColAngus because: (no reason given)

Hello? Is this thing on?

Does this site have an ignore function I don't know about? Bueller?

reply to post by ColAngus


Because RMFX1 has been stating that it is a lens flare, and possibly can't be something else, and did not post to a theory as to why. I wanted to read it from RMFX1.

Already read those, but, you're not changing my mind. I will say, I can't explain it, and it's not a lens flare.

Dust particles. Okay. Go do the red one now. They obviously did the blue one.



Line them up......

reply to post by odinson


That couldn't have been an astronomer since astronomers know that Nibiru is a hoax perpetrated by Sitchin.

reply to post by odinson

The question that I always had was why was our orbit and other planets orbit an elliptical. There has to be some force exerting its own influences on our system otherwise the planets should all have a circular orbit.

Not true. An orbit is in general an ellipse and that is in a 2 body system.

reply to post by Manhater


Being a scoffer is one way to support the failed hypothesis that the image shows an unknown object.

reply to post by Manhater


I used the method I posted earlier to check to see if there was something in front of the Sun. To be truthful I was looking for sunspots. Nothing in front of the Sun.

reply to post by RMFX1


I agree it looks similar. Scoffers will deny anything.

reply to post by stereologist


Like I said. I used no images from the sun. Only image, I used from the sun itself, was for that lens flare example to show the point of path of the little bubble lens flares. That's it. The pink area is the same shape on all 3.

That is a lens flare.

These images are not.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by RMFX1

 

I agree it looks similar. Scoffers will deny anything.

Funny how you sit there calling me a "scoffer". It's alright for you, but it's not alright for me. Are you not doing the same thing?

Got to love hypocrites.



You don't believe me, so why should I believe you?

If I wanted to be on highway with traffic going the same way, I would of taken the one way interstate.

reply to post by Manhater


You can lead a horse to water...

Btw, do you believe the moon is upside down as well?

reply to post by ColAngus


Got to go down sometime.



Or, wait, that's us turning.

reply to post by Manhater


You're right. In your first image the pink object does remind me of something...that's it, your picture is giving us the bird, and we all know the bird is the word. FACT.

reply to post by Manhater


I've been looking at the sun for months and I don't see anything.
This is where the second line would go. Right ?

Read (probably from a reliable source) that the outer planets have a wobble that is not explained by known bodies and was the original motivation to look for an additional planet out there.

Has their been an explanation of what causes that unpredictable wobble of the outer planets, or is that also a myth?


Other ATS thread

Since Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930, astronomers have searched in vain for a tenth planet.

The main justification for the search was made when discrepancies in the predicted positions of the outer planets Uranus and Neptune kept cropping up with alarming regularity.

Uranus has completed over two and a half orbits since its discovery in 1741, and Neptune, discovered in 1846, has completed almost one full circuit. Both planets should have accurately determined orbits by now. And yet, variations in their predicted positions, called residuals, persist.

reply to post by Manhater


Obviously we are quite different.

I used an alternate imaging modality today to view the solar disc. There is nothing there.

You on the other hand have done nothing other than scoff.