posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 12:57 AM
I don't remember exactly where I saw it, but there was a proposal recently that made sense. Basically, the answer is to write laws in simple English.
Say what they want to say, and leave out all the stuph that ultimately leads to all the subjective interpretations they claim ti be avoiding. If a law
needs to say it will be illegal to overtly pirate copyrighted material, do they really need 2 million sections, paragraphs, subsections, etc?
This approach would help in tax law for certain.