Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Mitt Romney is the anti-christ

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 15 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Remember the story of the boy who cried, "Wolf?" Someday there will be an anti-Christ. How about someone who runs the most powerful country on the face of the earth as President? How about someone who makes a deal with Israel to protect them and win the next American election when Israel attacks Iran in October of 2012? How about a leader in a major cult who was Bishop Romney? How about undisclosed sources of power, influence, and money? How about actually building a temple in Jerusalem, only it turns out to be a temple far different than any casual Bible reader would imagine, e.g. a Mormon temple? How about an economic leader? How about a false-prophet who has made great inroads into Christian churches other-wise known as Glenn Beck? Do any of these things add up to a Biblical description of the anti-Christ? As for people liking him? Promise me a job and many will love him.

Romney Could be anti-Christ





posted on Sep, 15 2012 @ 11:07 AM
link   
reply to post by BelowPublicKnowledge
 


If you are speaking of the biblical anti-Christ, he does not fulfill the criteria.
If you are saying he seems like a dishrag, well, aren't they all?



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by HiHoAZaway
I definitely don't think he would take the country in the right direction, but on that note I don't think any POTUS has much of a say in what direction the country heads... like you say TPTB make those decisions. I don't think the anti-christ will be any ones "Lacky." It will be someone that the elitist respect.


The only ones that could come close in today's world would be Bill or Hillary, but we know they're not anti-christs because all republicans hate them and everybody is supposed to love whoever the anti-christ happens to be.

So... Bill and Hillary just ROCK!!



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by netgamer7k
Remember remember remember... Obama in 2008. (And early 2009 I suppose.)

Everybody was flocking after Obama, even those who didn't particularly liked him still had some positive feeling towards newly elected president. Obama even went to Europe for his campaign, it was insane how popular and likeable he was at that time. We all seem to forget so easily.

Obama was just a snapshot, a taste if you will, of what the Antichrist will be like. Obama was scratching the surface of what's to come. The Antichrist will be similar in many ways, but on a much grander scale. Except he won't be some globalist puppet, but rather the real deal. The man who actually saves the collapsed societies of the world and usher in an age of peace and prosperity. Globally known, immensely popular and even the Bible Christians themselves will be heavily tempted to embrace him. But we know better, because his reign is cut short according to Biblical prophecy.
edit on 13-4-2012 by netgamer7k because: (no reason given)


But the thing is, I didn't support Obama in 2008. I was angry over the way he treated Hillary in the primaries and I ended up voting for McCain (although that Palin woman was a total nut-job, I did respect McCain).

HOWEVER, I will be voting for Obama this time, mostly because Hillary isn't running. As far as Romney, the only thing I actually like about him is that he's Mormon (the one thing his party hates about him).

The anti-Christ hasn't reared his head yet, at least not in this country. I had some bets riding on bush, but that didn't pan out, he was just a moron, not the anti-christ.... although cheney came really really close!!! ..other than people actually liking him.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:16 PM
link   
I'd say politics- in general- has more than its share of folks with a Messiah complex. It's probably some sort of unspoken requirement to be a politician.



posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by windword
Wait, I thought this issue was settled long ago. Ronald Reagan was the Antichrist.

home.mcn.net...


you have a point there, even democrats liked him....

HEY!!! Maybe it's Clint Eastwood!!! The Republicans like him because of the empty chair/alzheimer's speech and the Democrats still feel sorry for him and forgive him for it and love him because of Josey Wales and Dirty Harry... He COULD be the anti-Christ!!!

...or.... wait for it....

....wait for it....

....
....

...

BETTY WHITE!!!!!


Who doesn't LOVE Betty White????



posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 09:55 PM
link   
The anti-Christ is a powerful king. A new king of the Mongols has been appointed this year; a descendant of great Chengiz Khan. The trouble has already started.

Anti-Christ is someone who has the power to fight the Christians as a whole. Anti-Christ will be a person who has the command of a large and powerful army.
edit on 30-4-2013 by GargIndia because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 10:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by GargIndia
The anti-Christ is a powerful king. A new king of the Mongols has been appointed this year; a descendant of great Chengiz Khan. The trouble has already started.


Who do you mean by that?? There is no such position as King of the Mongols - if there was it would be termed the Great Khan or Khagan (Khan of Khans) - and there isn't one of those either.

the last descendant of Chingiz to carry the title Khan was executed in the purges of 1937



posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 10:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


The titles do not matter.

Titles are temporary.

You have to go by blood lines.

The Khans had legitimate and a lot of illegitimate children. It is impossible that all descendants of Chengiz are killed.



posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 


Indeed - but nonetheless you say ther is a new "king of the mongols" recently - who is that??



posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


I believe you know him.



posted on May, 1 2013 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by BelowPublicKnowledge
 


I prefer knowledge that is above public knowledge


Anyway you merry ban of nutters, I thought you all said it was Obama, your also an idiot !



posted on May, 1 2013 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by GargIndia
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


I believe you know him.


I know lots of people - but I don't know that any of them are descended from Ghengis Khan. And then theere are the people I know of - but have never met - all the people in the news, foreigners, that sort of thing. So yeah - I might know or know of him - but how would I know that unless you tell me who it is?

Why the obsfucation?? Why not just tell us the name??



posted on May, 1 2013 @ 08:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


Sometimes codewords are necessary. Watch out for the events.

If a certain country has become suddenly aggressive, it will be reflected in military moves.

Europe is on the path to self destruction through the faulty scheme of a single currency without political unity.

US is on the path to self destruction by harbouring and encouraging elements that are against its founding principles and way of life.

Most of the other nations are governed by childish rulers and contain ignorant masses.

A small amount of analysis will make the situation clear to you.



posted on May, 1 2013 @ 08:33 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 


Why are "code words" necessary?

Sometimes you are allowed to stop taking riddles.



posted on May, 1 2013 @ 11:52 PM
link   
OK. More clues:

1. The leader is born and his family is from within the borders of empire of Chengiz Khan.
2. He is the commander of world's largest or second largest army.
3. He follows a religion or belief that does not conform to Christianity's principles.

I hope it helps.



posted on May, 2 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 


I'm not interested in playing your silly guessing game - if you can't or won't bother giving a name then I think it speaks more to some odd need on your part than anything else.



posted on May, 2 2013 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


We have already entered a period of strife in the world when militaries are busy working on war plans.

So I need to be discreet. I am sure you will find out the person in due time with your own effort.



posted on May, 2 2013 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 


If it is as easy to research as you say then I must be hte last person in the world to know it - why are you hiding this supposedly "easily found" information behind a wall of pathetic excuses?!



posted on May, 2 2013 @ 10:16 PM
link   
jeepers Im agreeing with Aloysius the Gaul here
yes Virginnia there is a god...


I thought everyone knew:
You can't prove a negative!
first someone is going to have to prove there is a PosiChrist
edit on 2-5-2013 by Danbones because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join