It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Corruptedstructure
Liberal moderators asking Republicans double edged questions..........................
Whats not to like?
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
I don't understand how knowing Chinese is a bad thing? What don't you understand about that? knowing the culture and knowing the language can only help in foreign affairs.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by RSF77
I don't know, but this is an American debate, in America. Generally people speak English on these debates so people can understand what they are saying. I wasn't commenting on Chinese culture or the price of tea in their country, I was commenting on the fact he spoke Chinese in an American debate.
They were talking about China and how each candidate understands it. Huntsman spoke Chinese and explained that he lived overseas and stuff. That proves that he has experience. Nothing bad about that in my experience.
Originally posted by Tesclo
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Corruptedstructure
Liberal moderators asking Republicans double edged questions..........................
Whats not to like?
Haha that's funny.
Originally posted by Wookiep
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
Romney Paul Huntsman on Tuesday
I think the media is already trying to hold up Gingrich again. You may have to replace Hunstman for Gingrich, just my opinion. Paul will have his supporters no matter what, others will vote for who the media talks about.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
The auditorium seats are still warm and already the MSM is declaring Romney the "winner" as though a debate like this can have a clear winner. Every candidate said something most people can agree with. The thing I find amazing is that Romney is such a polished politician, he can deliver a two-minute answer and not say a goddamn thing.
"We need to balance trade".. HOW, Mitt?
"We need to strengthen our economy"... No kidding, Mitt, and how do you propose we do that?
The man speaks in soundbites and has no substance whatsoever.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Ron Paul is more than a candidate. He's a line in the sand. He's a movement of liberty. He's representing the real freedom movement, the one group among all others who have truly woken up.
2012 might be the last election before everything breaks down. Ron Paul, IMO, is seen as the ``last shot`` to change things peacefully.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
reply to post by RSF77
Well, it was directed at Romney who owns a few chinese companies and he doesn't know the language. Poor leadership in my view. Jon's got more experience with China than all of them and he was showing them just that. That's why he did it! To show them they need to live in the cultures to understand the culture that they are most worried about.