Venus can be deceptive, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 07:00 AM by DJW001
reply to post by 2timesOO



Your link isn't working. You need to copy the string that comes after "v=" and paste it into the box that comes up when you press the "Youtube" button.



reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 07:15 AM by elevenaugust
Here's OP's video:



And...





Venus also here.....
edit on 7-1-2012 by elevenaugust because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 07:18 AM by DJW001
reply to post by elevenaugust



It's worth pointing out that the "crystalline structure" is due to the arrangement of sensors on the camera's CCD. (Charge Coupled Device.)


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 07:25 AM by elevenaugust
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to
post by elevenaugust



It's worth pointing out that the "crystalline structure" is due to the arrangement of sensors on the camera's CCD. (Charge Coupled Device.)

Absolutely right! Thanks for the precision.


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 10:21 AM by Human_Alien
reply to post by 2timesOO



You mean 'fooled' not 'fouled' right?

You know, I really really have to wonder if these non-contrails that are traipsing our skies, aren't indeed changing the atmosphere. Because nothing for nothin'......many of the celestial bodies are illuminating like crystal prisms lately.
I mean, have you checked out some of the stars? Not sure which stars exactly (Arcturus maybe?) They have color to them that I've never seen before. Even our planets are emitting colors too.

Oh for the love of gawd. This is why people are so stuck on stupid. I went to look up 'stars' and on this official "Stars in our Sky" website, they are saying our planets are stars
www.scopecity.net...

These are PLANETS not STARS!!!!!!
Morons!


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 03:31 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by Human_Alien



They haven't updated the fact that Venus is gone!

Morons!!



edit on 7/1/12 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 04:11 PM by DJW001
reply to post by zorgon



I for one am getting fed up with all these uber skeptics posting NON UFO videos in the UFO Alien thread. Since this is a video of VENUS, put it in the SCIENCE section...

Its NOT a UFO Stop cluttering the topic


The idea is to prevent the forum being cluttered with easily identified items, like Venus, in the belief that they are UFOs.


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 06:54 PM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to
post by elevenaugust



It's worth pointing out that the "crystalline structure" is due to the arrangement of sensors on the camera's CCD. (Charge Coupled Device.)
If you're talking about the pixellated effect at 00:13, that's what it looks like to me too.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
I'm trying to remember the last time we had a "diamond" UFO video pop up on ATS.

I think it's been a while.

That's a good thing!
You're right Chad, I don't recall seeing one for a while either. That's usually due to the shape of the camera's aperture.

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by zorgon



I for one am getting fed up with all these uber skeptics posting NON UFO videos in the UFO Alien thread. Since this is a video of VENUS, put it in the SCIENCE section...

Its NOT a UFO Stop cluttering the topic
The idea is to prevent the forum being cluttered with easily identified items, like Venus, in the belief that they are UFOs.
I recall reading somewhere that Venus is very commonly reported as a UFO. So I agree, it doesn't hurt to educate people about how easily it not only can be, but has been mistaken for a UFO.


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 06:58 PM by Jay-morris
reply to post by Arbitrageur





I recall reading somewhere that Venus is very commonly reported as a UFO. So I agree, it doesn't hurt to educate people about how easily it not only can be, but has been mistaken for a UFO.


And it has also been used to debunk ufo cases, when in these cases, it clearly was not venus. Its a get out card for debunkers


reply posted on 7-1-2012 @ 09:13 PM by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Jay-morris


No doubt about that, but that's probably an inescapable result of the fact that so many of the cases debunked as Venus actually were Venus...but no doubt it was inappropriately applied in some cases.

One case I've always wondered about was President Jimmy Carter's sighting, which some people tried to claim was likely Venus, though Carter insisted it wasn't. Unfortunately when you file your report of your sighting 4 years after your sighting, and you're not even sure of the date of the sighting, it's pretty much a hopeless cause to determine if Venus was in that part of the sky at the time of the sighting. The best thing would have been to go look at a star/planet chart right after the sighting (now we'd use Stellarium), or at least file the report right away so we'd know the correct date/time. Sadly, we'll never know in the case of Carter's sighting due to the uncertainty.


edit on 7-1-2012 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



reply posted on 9-1-2012 @ 01:30 PM by DJW001
reply to post by zorgon



So maybe I should do a thread on objects identified as UFOs too... like these


Please do. Far be it for me to dictate what people should be able to post!


reply posted on 9-1-2012 @ 01:31 PM by greeneyedleo
THAT is why THIS thread was created....
However, I find most people are very very lazy and refuse to do any research themselves on what they may have seen. Their desire for their object to be identified as extraterrestrial can cloud all logic......

Stellarium and even Google Sky (for one's smartphone) are the best sources to see what is up there at your location, time and date. No reason to be confused if you use both of those sources.

All the other sources on that thread will list other resources for various misidentified "things"....
edit on January 9th 2012 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^