While I do find this technology quite fascinating, I have to ask the question of how many times this would be used as a weapon rather as a deterrent. And then there will be the 9/11 angle.

If 9/11 truly was an inside job (not the thread direction) could this technology already exist and could it have been used in the attacks. Ok, had to throw that out there.

And then there is the future to consider. This is said to be a Non-Lethal Weapon. It is that only if no one uses it as a weapon. A hammer is considered a Non Lethal Tool. Until it cracks someone's head open and it then becomes the "Weapon" in court.

Here comes da conspiracy!

How easy would it be for anyone to create a false flag event using planes? Very easy IMO. Quite simply, hijack a plane without being on board and slam it into an aircraft carrier, building, stadium...whatever. No witnesses and no suspects because there were no "terrorists" even on the plane. Nice huh?

Descriptions of the Pentagon’s very latest non-lethal weapon projects have been leaked online. Publicintelligence.org recently published the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate’s ‘Non-Lethal Weapons Reference Book’, which includes devices in use and some that have been dreamed up for the future.

One of the fantasy weapon systems is a laser device fitted to a plane that can actually steer an enemy aircraft away from a restricted area – somehow.

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... ml#ixzz1iit2JkKU

At last we see a possible explanation for presence of the E-4B electronic warfare airfcraft filmed by CNN and others over New York and Washington on 911, something that was never explained in the official version of events. - Graham Casey, Australia, 5/1/2012 11:23 -- 19 Green arrows for this ill informed post! Shame on you people! The E-4B is not an "electronic warfare aircraft" it is a command and control aircraft more commonly known as Air Force One and was not only noted numerous times in the media but there is a very simple explanation, it was participating inthe "global guardian" training exercise which was cancelled when the first plane hit and was in the air after requesting emergency takeoff from Andrews, ultimately in circled in a few places near the capital after being granted clearance to do so (all of which is recorded and available info) As an airbone command centre would be safer from further attacks that may have been coming it makes sense to have it in the area - Dave, Birmingham Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... ml#ixzz1ij3ttjL1

Dave, Birmingham, 5/1/2012 21:43 Dave do a bit more research Airforce 1 is the Presidential plane, these E-4B's are a different animal altogether. Agree there were exercises going on which was the official explanation for the woeful response by the supposed top gun air force and NORAD which inexplicably had a system of tracking and interception that worked before 911 and after 911 but not on 911.You really don’t have to be any sort of believer in theories to destroy the official 911 version of events. To believe this official version you have to enter a make-believe world where even the laws of physics were suspended just for that day. Just look at any of the US funded documentaries with a critical eye and you will see historical revisionism at work, the presentation of selected facts and the deletion of others. It’s clever and fools most people who think the electronic picture box in the living room is a source of news or truth, it often isn’t. - graham casey Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... ml#ixzz1ij4Azxh1

Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
reply to post by jude11

---

Yes, except that wasn't the scenario...professional pilots have stated that the 'turns' that were required to steer at least one plane into a tower, was physically IMPOSSIBLE do.

They've tried to repeat these manouvers, over and over in simulators, and have never been able to duplicate.

Basically the g-forces generated would likely knocked everyone onboard, unconscious.