It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who actually supports Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum?

page: 2
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I guess it's because I don't know anyone like that. But I can't believe there are that many of those kinds of people still left in the this country. TV's influence on people is astounding.




posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Sherlock Holmes
 


So you're saying I'm creepy because I support my candidate whole-heartidly as opposed the normal "Well I'm apathetic towards politics. I voted republican last year so I'll just vote for who foxnews says I should." Please don't insult me. Also please tell me what is crazy about ron paul. If you can give me one thing about him that is "crazy" I will applaud you. Is peace crazy? Is personal freedom crazy? Is a sound fiscal plan crazy? Is challenging a system that is CLEARLY broken crazy? If these are crazy to you, than you are in fact the crazy one.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by xavi1000
C'mon dinosaurs ..show yourself and post why you support Romney or Santorum and taking this country in another disaster ...baby boomers have internet too



HAHAHAHA!!!!!! Yeah, come on!

Hop on your brontosauruses and ride on over to your computer and chime in! We're dying to hear your arguments for these two buzzards!



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

See above rant.

I mean really.

Is war the issue?
Then Ron Paul. Or Obama.
They'll both wave the white flag.

Is the erosion of the US Constitution a bigger deal?
Then Romney would be your guy.

Is there anyone perfect running?
Heck no!

What's your line in the sand?
edit on 6-1-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)


Hmmm..


Obamas a pretty good Neo-Con in disguise.


Just sayin.......



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by NightGypsy
 


I have been talking a lot to my neighbors and the merchants in my neighborhood about this election...and many of them are just not interested.. and/or have deep apathy...and many say that they don't like the choices and won't vote this year.

It is sad that so many Americans....don't really care...and refuse to know anything beyond their immediate life and what they are about.

As for voting for Romney or Santorum...you have got to be kidding me!....


For those who may not know what (apathy) means...."is a state of indifference, or the suppression of emotions such as concern, excitement, motivation and passion..." en.wikipedia.org...







edit on 6-1-2012 by caladonea because: add more

edit on 6-1-2012 by caladonea because: add more



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by caladonea
 


Well said. Apathy is the biggest issue with people in this country, hands down.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Praetorius
 


reply to post by seberhar
 


I address you both because I see something in common.

War.
Foreign policy.

Yes, war sucks. As someone in the Army I could write a book about how sucky war is. It's violent, it's dirty, it's noisy, it's ugly.

I hate it.

But just "not fighting" doesn't end war.

In fact, to some, it would invite it.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


"not fighting doesn't end war" Can you elaborate on that? And if war sucks, then why not take your best shot to avoid it?



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 


AAAAAARRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Sonny?

I wish we had a perfect person running.

But Palin said no. (
)



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by seberhar
reply to post by beezzer
 


"not fighting doesn't end war" Can you elaborate on that? And if war sucks, then why not take your best shot to avoid it?


It takes both sides to not fight.
If just one side decides not to fight it's called conquest.

Sometimes, the "best shot" is to beat the SOB's so badly that the war ends.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   
I'm on the anybody but Mitt (and obviously Obama) bandwagon.

Even more so since McCain came out an endorsed Romney.

Ron Paul is a joke, so I'm now leaning Santorum.
edit on 6-1-2012 by Carseller4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


If that's what you honestly believe than there's really no point in debating. Fighting never solves anything. All it does it expose people's inner demons. True resolution is reached when we use our brains, not our muscles. Thanks for your responses.
edit on 6-1-2012 by seberhar because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


I was thinking on the Lines of Neville Chamberlain,and appeasement.

It didnt stop Hitler one bit.

Great intentions though.
edit on 6-1-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Carseller4
 


Why do you think ron paul is a joke? I guess you like war and debt?



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by seberhar
 


all the republican big guns are out and waiting for 2016. why do you think you have this "crop" of seemingly inept people running this year? because either they know Obama will be re-elected, or they are keeping their powder dry for a better opportunity in 2016. they threw Dole a bone in 1996, knowing full well that he didn't have a chance of beatiung Clinton in his run for a second term....same thing this year. there are still too many fresh and painful memories from "W" Bush, to have any meaningful impact this election cycle. in 2012, the republicans are just going through the motions to appear viable.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmyx
 


That is a really interesting idea. I never thought about that. There might be some truth there. Could this be one of the reasons they don't want Dr. Paul to get the nomination? He's not an inept crony like the rest of them.



posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by seberhar
reply to post by beezzer
 


If that's what you honestly believe than there's really no point in debating. Fighting never solves anything. All it does it expose people's inner demons. True resolution is reached when we use our brains, not our muscles. Thanks for your responses.
edit on 6-1-2012 by seberhar because: (no reason given)


There's a difference between aggression and defending.

Defeding ones country may have to require some offensive strategy.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join