posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 05:04 AM
reply to post by malcr
You see you my friend had missed the point....and just by the way you yourself may approach a thread by tear down effect .....the statement put out by
the person i quoted opens the door for even a imprint to survive....Plausible......foot steps into sedimentry material....then material over time
becomes invaded by lava flow .....possible....is this the case....one does not know now do they....
highly...yes very highly unlikely but indeed plausible....so you see ...could it be in the realm of possibility...yes it could....
Now my point to Wmd is the attack method of going at peoples opinions....It is a tactic used to boost ones ego....to make themselves feel supperior
to another because they grasp hold of a touch of info and say to others this is the way it is and the only POSSIBLE way it could be....well the world
has many.....many unanswered questions in it's mystreious past.....and could this footprint be a hoax....well it is POSSIBLE....but by the same
token...could it be a true representation of something for our distant past....POSSIBLE.
So to come in and and just say this is not true...because he found a bit of info that says this cannot happen yet soomeone else comes in with a bit
of info that says it can shows POSSIBILITES....now your saying that fossils are possible....yet a footprint could not be possible.....Now in the vid
the man actually claims nothing he states nothing really...he just points out it is there....He also just makes an observation of the mudlike
structure from the imprint just as any person would so if one takes that into account....in order to carve that into the stone one would need to take
away the stone around it would he not?
Carving is about taking away to expose a structure underneath....now that is quite the hoax which means someone has far to much time on their hands
Now as a stated in the beginning....when people do a word for word breakdown on a reply it tells me they are use to trying to rip peoples comments
apart just as yourself has tried to achieve....It is a method of character assassination which IMHO is another ego building method of reply because
words get taken out of context which then have no meaning to the whole reply.
Now i will guarantee niether yourself or Wmd are geologists....just as i am not....so the thoughts put forward are just opinion which can be just
presented as information....or presented as an attack on another individual because of their opinion....so as far as the footprint is it real or is it
a hoax.....IMHO I would tend to think that no one would have wasted their days in the middle of BFN carvingout a footprint but i guess you would tend
to think this would be perfectly logical....and if you read the posting i put forward on pg7 and went to the links....you would know that this is not
a new discovery but has been there for a greart many years even if the man in the vid was trying to promote tourism to the area.
053131p://f06Sunday by plube because: (no reason given)