It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vandalour
reply to post by Xcalibur254
Theories are like candy for my brain a open mind is a healthy mind
supporting a theory is not the same as believing in it, because its still just a theory.
if the theory dont come true its just as fascinating as if it does.
I like theories, I like ATS
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by bekisu
Wishful thinking and dangerous thinking. I have been saying this for a while now, but the ones who buy into these theories are the ones that see there are problems with the world, but are too lazy to do anything about it. They expect some cosmic reset button to be pressed so they don't need to do the work that needs to be done. Instead they can just sit around expounding on how the world needs to change without actually making any attempt to make a difference.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
I'm back once again with a question for supporters of the various 2012 theories. This one is actually quite simple. (1) Why? Why do you put so much belief into this event occurring? The other day I made a thread asking for someone to provide me with an example of the (2) Long Count that ends after 13 baktun. So far the only person that has replied to that thread is stereologist. In other words nobody has been able to find an example of the Long Count that ends after 13 baktun. If you can't even provide evidence of the most basic elements of these theories, why do you believe in them? I must be missing something here. People who support these theories claim to be open minded and that they have done intensive research. In the end however the sources always come up the same. New Age authors that are either misinterpreting archaeological evidence or telling outright lies. (3) So, why do you put so much faith into these theories when you haven't even looked for the primary sources they come from?