It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
But that doesn't change the suspicion and fact in some people's minds: the GOP (whether corrupt or off-track or hijacked) will not let Paul win as one of them.
That means Paul WILL NOT win as a Republican. I don't understand the purpose of running a presidential campaign as a party member that he cannot possibly win.
Domain name: watchthevote2012.com
Jim Condit Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org)
PO Box 11339
Cincinnati, OH 45211
Linked by Michelle Malkin, thanks
ETA: Well, there's also this:
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Below is the affidavit of Edward L. True. In his local Caucus in Appanoose County, Iowa (precinct Washington Wells), Mitt Romney actually received 2 votes. The Iowa State GOP HQ, using their secret computer program, programmed by an unknown person, hidden from the public in a secret location -- credited Romney with 22 votes for Washington Wells Precinct -- 20 more than Romney actually received.
If we are to believe the Iowa State GOP's published numbers on Caucus Night, this changes the outcome of the Iowa Caucus. Since it was published for worldwide distribution that Romney "won" by only 8 votes out of some 122,000 votes case -- this means that Rick Santorem is now the winner by 12 votes.
As you will see, both the caucus leader and the GOP County Chairman have confirmed to Mr. True (and others who will come forth with affidavits soon - that Mr. True's report is correct. Below the affidavit from Edward L. True, you will see the actual tally sheet he himself created at the caucus -- as well as the screen shots taken by Judy Spady of Durango, Colorado from the official Iowa GOP HQ Google Docs, which confirm that the Iowa GOP HQ credited Romney with 22 votes, rather than the 2 votes he received. The official Iowa GOP website made it impossible to take only one screen shot and get the data, so there are three screen shots.
Mrs. Spady will shortly publish an affidavit that the screen shots reflect exactly what she saw on the internet -- before the Iowa GOP HQ pulled all the numbers down off the internet a few hours later. (What's the rush boys?) And why did the leaders at Iowa State GOP HQ, for the first time ever, tell the GOP County Chairmen not to give anyone the numbers from the caucuses in the their local county, including local newspaper? Looks like somebody at Iowa State GOP HQ doesn't want to make it easy for people to check the local Caucus results against what is published on the Iowa State GOP Website.
So this affidavit changes the outcome of the Iowa Caucus 2012, right? Or does the Iowa GOP HQ wish to acknowledge that they have made mistakes in other precincts?
Yeah, cause if this happened there and votes were added for Romney, then it probably happened for others too.
Visit link for Affidavit
And if they can add votes to precinct totals, they can take them away, too. Catch my drift?edit on Fri Jan 6th 2012 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Whether Iowa is 'technically' significant or not is irrelevant.
The nation heard Romney won, Paul lost. THAT is the significant part.
Originally posted by Observor
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
As has already been pointed out, even if Paul wins Republican nomination, many Republicans (typically the war-party) would vote for Trump as an independent.
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
This is 2012...
How hard is it to set-up 6 cameras on a live stream for everyone to watch the voting/counting (not ballot casting of course). You can get a cheap Chinese webcam for like $5 these days...
In the age of technology, you would figure today's advances would be taken advantage of....
Examiner: Mr. Curtis, are there programs that could be secretly used to fix elections?
Originally posted by benrl
The report I read said that it looked like some one transposed the numbers... No hacking just human error...
I support ron paul as much as the next, and I want all the crooks out of Washington, but this is misleading, a little research goes a long way.
It was reported right away and the difference was between turning 02 to 20...
Not really a huge conspiracy.
From my understanding of the process in Iowa its really just a straw poll anyway, and what counts are the delegates that get picked after the voting to chose the candidate.edit on 6-1-2012 by benrl because: (no reason given)