It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


US Radiation Levels Increase Since March 2011

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 01:11 PM
I saved these images from the website Radiation Network

March 14, 2011 (Before pacific wind arrival)

March 18, 2011 (Day of arrival)

March 24

March 28

April 11

May 9

August 11

Sept 30

November 14

December 29

January 5

posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 01:22 PM
Fukushima is like that wayward cousin everyone is well aware of but no one actually invites to anything. He'll never arrive on time, but eventually, he'l get there and make everyone remember why they disliked him in the first place.

Welcome to America Fukushima...We knew you'd make it here sooner or later.

posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 01:32 PM
Forgive my ignorance, But I am unsure as to what I am seeing.

The #'s inside the circles I assume are tested radiation levels. What do the #'s mean/Signify? The higher the number, the more active radiation? And at what point is considered harmful? (not that any is good)

I also find it interesting that the #'s seem sporadic. There seems to be no pattern - just random spikes in radiation.

Thanks in advance,


posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:13 PM
The map is explained on the website itself (link is provided at the top of the post.)

While the numbers do look sporadic, there is clearly an increase if you compare the first and last images.

posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:48 PM
Thank you. That is a well put together site. I will have to book mark it for future reference.

I agree the general sum of the test numbers are rising - my point was though they are all rising it seems to be sporadic, and/or not constant. Almost like waves of higher/lower radiation are washing over. The numbers are varying is all I am hinting at. Yes, all have for the most part increased but not in a constant motion as if a uniform 'wave' of radiation swept across the states.

If i start to see close groupings of numbers on a rapid increase across the entire map ----> that would be cause for concern!

Either way, Good post and thanks.


posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 01:18 AM
Yeah! Radiation levels are high.

posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:31 AM
According to what I read on the website, isn't levels below 100 considered safe, background radiation?

posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:36 AM
reply to post by DeReK DaRkLy

There was this as well on November 22, 2011:

Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
High Radiation In Michigan Due To Radioactive Rain?

I ran across this post:

Radiation Watch 2011

Originally posted by Aircooled
This was just on Radnet. Then it disappeared

I responed with these posts:

Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Aircooled

Yikes. That's right in my backyard. What the deuce?

reply to post by Aircooled

It's been raining heavily/steadily most of the afternoon here. Perhaps the radioactive rain everyone says doesn't exist spiked the reading temporarily.

Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Aircooled

A quick blog search returned this:

RADIOACTIVE rainwater in Michigan. Child develops rash from possible radiation burns. Please forward!!


edit on 11/22/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: video

I thought this might be important enough to start a thread.

Michigan residents with monitoring equipment are encouraged to report your findings.

edit on 11/22/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: typos

edit on 11/22/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: typo

High Radiation In Michigan Today 11/22/11 Due To Radioactive Rain?

new topics

top topics


log in