Am I Enlightened? Are You Enlightened?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 09:15 AM by midicon
reply to post by ErgoTheConfusion



One man's enlightenment may be another man's folly.

Each of us may have a different idea of what enlightenment is.

Please define what you mean by 'enlightened'...and 'lightens'

And did the rock move when it left?
edit on 5-1-2012 by midicon because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 09:20 AM by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to post by Annunak1



In order to lighten, you know what it feels like to be darkened.

When will a rock be moved? When moved by a mover, but there is no mover without the moved.

One point's positive is another point's negative. My up is China's down from a view that asks the question expecting an actual answer.


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 09:27 AM by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to post by midicon



When is a man sickened? When experiencing the sensation of sickness.

When is a woman enlivened? When experiencing the sensation of liveliness.

There is no additional definition or clarity needed to know when a person is "enlightened".

They and only they know it, even if they don't know they know it yet.

The blockage is the idea of being enlightened without being darkened, though it is only a "blockage" when viewed from a certain differently enlightened vantage point.

The question of whether the rock moved... who is asking the question?


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 11:52 AM by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to post by The1Prettiest1One



Was a question really being asked?



edit on 2012/1/5 by ErgoTheConfusion because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 03:49 PM by The1Prettiest1One
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to
post by The1Prettiest1One



Was a question really being asked?



edit on 2012/1/5 by ErgoTheConfusion because: (no reason given)


Perhaps, if somehow One became aware that something "I" seemed to think so.

Earthquake! And the rock hops joyfully...
edit on 1/5/2012 by The1Prettiest1One because: (no reason given)


That which is illuminated by some other source does in fact glow itself but in its own preferred bands.
edit on 1/5/2012 by The1Prettiest1One because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 05:00 PM by Golden Rule
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
Whether we are material or consciousness or both, we know the universe reflects back to us the truths within ourselves.


Sorry, I don't understand your point. Do you mean: "Whether we (consider ourselves to be) solely a material entity or an entity composed of consciousness or an entity that is at once both..."??

There seemed to be some ambiguity in your opening statement - i.e. that it could be interpreted that you yourself are not certain whether a human being is composed of matter or the stuff of consciousness or that you know the truth of the matter and others may not though.

Leaving consciousness out of the equation, is the objective world composed of matter or energy? The answer to this is elementary. How the world appears to our senses and what it actually is are two different things. Appearances can be deceiving. When energy itself is considered a gross interpretation of reality the same way matter is considered a gross interpretation of energy, then what is that third layer?

I have an intuition that the deeper one penetrates into matter itself there comes a point where the observer and what is observed is one and the same - consciousness meets consciousness.

Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
We are enlightened when something lightens us. Nothing more. It is the sensation of lightening... not the reaching a point.


This reminds me of the crowd in the cinema whose eyes are filled with the reflected light from the projector behind them. They become enlightened by an external source of light. Then they become excited and animated and feel a kind of brotherhood - those who bask in the same light of the stars of Hollywood. When one laughs, other laugh too in allegiance with the plot.

But should there be a power failure and the theatre is plunged into darkness, where is the light which bound them together? Now there is isolation, and following that boredom and restlessness. Now even a flashlight will appease the hunger for entertainment and a sense of reality.

Where is the light in a sensory deprivation (or float) tank? When there is no external light source the mind becomes unconscious and searches for light stored in dream imagery.

I see enlightenment as being illumination from a non-external light source, me.


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 05:09 PM by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to post by Golden Rule


Whether you lighten yourself, or "let something else" do it for you, it's still an experience of "being lightened".

You make the definition that to be in a state where the self isn't self illuminated is a non-enlightened state. However when on the mountaintop the trip to the bottom of the valley may be the desired peak of experience.

Defining one as "is" versus "isn't" is like saying that to be in pain is different whether you hit yourself or someone else hits you. Granted the interpretation may be different, but genuinely experiencing pain is possible from either source. It is also able to be ignored from both. One is self generated, the other is self generated by proxy (but only in the same sense that a finger is a proxy of the hand which is a proxy for the head that it just hit).

To define one as more enlightened than the other is still grasping.

As for matter/energy (material/consciousness): I can't be sure of either. The answer is as important in the end as whether green is perfect because of the blue or the yellow.
edit on 2012/1/5 by ErgoTheConfusion because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 05:41 PM by Golden Rule
reply to post by ErgoTheConfusion



Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
reply to post by Golden Rule


Whether you lighten yourself, or "let something else" do it for you, it's still an experience of "being lightened".

You make the definition that to be in a state where the self isn't self illuminated is a non-enlightened state.



Thank you ErgoTheConfusion, in reply

I wrote:

Originally posted by Golden Rule

I see enlightenment as being illumination from a non-external light source


I didn't mean to say that the self is enlightened only when it is self illuminated, but that the illumination would not be from an external light source.

And, that the self isn't illuminated by its own effort or power as there would still be duality - the self and the light it, itself, has created. No, rather that the self must be composed of light itself.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Do you feel this way too?
  Posted 8 days ago with 64 member flags
Fibonacci Numbers, Phi, and the Venus/Earth Relation
  Posted 5 days ago with 57 member flags
The Truth about "New Agers"
  Posted 16 days ago with 36 member flags
Evolution happens. That\'s a fact.
  Posted 7 days ago with 28 member flags
Spirit Animal Guides Mine is Raven, what is yours?
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags
If you could be anything what would you be?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags