It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Having said that, the levels shown are less than what you're exposed to from a CT scan.
You would have to eat tonnes of the stuff to have any effect, although, that's besides the point really.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
It's hard to tell if this is normal, you'd need to test a 1000 samples to see the whats really going on here.
Having said that, the levels shown are less than what you're exposed to from a CT scan.
You would have to eat tonnes of the stuff to have any effect, although, that's besides the point really.
I wouldn't call it disingenuous, as I think the poster had good intentions to put it in perspective.
Originally posted by starchild10
To compare the radiation to a CT scan is disingenious to say the least.
1) No extra radiation is good for you. In fact in the leaflet put out by the UK NHS they acknowledge that having a mammogram actually CAUSES some cancers.
2) The radiation from X rays, CT scans etc cannot be compared to CONSUMED food. Even more so if that food is consumed regularly.