posted on Jan, 16 2012 @ 02:37 PM
Although there are some likenesses to Lovelady, including facial features, the clothing strongly matches Oswald, and it was an unusual manner of
dress. Obviously, Doorman could not have been both Oswald and Lovelady, so one side or the other had to be faked. But which one? Well, you know for
sure that there was no conspiracy to fraudulently exonerate Oswald by implanting his picture there to exonerate him. And, you know that there was a
concerted effort to incriminate him. Therefore, if anything was faked, it had to be the Lovelady side, not the Oswald side.
The unbuttoned, loose-fitting outer shirt over the v-neck t-shirt is the largest visible element of the image. It couldn't be removed. But the facial
features were small and could be replaced. Lovelady was present in the picture, standing in front of and to the left of Oswald. I believe they moved
his face to Doorman's and then obliterated the rest of Lovelady to remove him from the picture. Dr. James Fetzer, the famed JFK researcher, agrees
with me, and he and I have co-authored a paper about it.
Keep in mind that the conspirators were counting on people to think just the way you have thought: The face looks like Lovelady, so it must be him.
But look at the clothing, and in particular, look at the collars. They are screaming Oswald all the way. I am going to insert the introduction to my
first video because it's gives a good perspective on the mathematical probabilities. Please, keep your mind open about this.
In poker, you have to calculate the odds of a guy drawing a certain card. For instance, the odds of drawing an inside straight are 1 in 13. So, let's
size up the odds in this case.
The fact that both Oswald and Doorman look generally alike and are both wearing a loose-fitting outer shirt, that is unbuttoned, over a white t-shirt
with a v-neck, creates, in itself, a strong likelihood that they are the same person.
Take the one issue of both shirts being unbuttoned. What percentage of men at work in the city go around with their shirt largely unbuttoned?
Percentage-wise, it has got to be small. I don't know what it is exactly, but you'd have to agree that it could be no greater than 1 in 10. Right?
If you don't agree, then walk down the street in downtown Dallas, Texas or any other big city and start observing men, and keep track of how many are
buttoned vs unbuttoned, and come up with your own number. Take a representative sample. I think 1 in 10 is actually too big, but we'll go with it.
The simple fact is that: MOST MEN BUTTON UP.
Now, there's no doubt that Oswald was unbuttoned- he was unbuttoned when he was arrested. Plus, we know that his buttons were missing, so he had to
be unbuttoned. But nobody reported Lovelady being unbuttoned, and in the one picture we have of him from that day, he was NOT unbuttoned.
Mathematically speaking, that one variable, by itself, creates strong odds that Doorman was Oswald and not Lovelady.
But then, you keep going. Both Oswald's and Doorman's shirts were loose-fitting, somewhat over-sized, and I put the odds of that at around 1 in 3.
But now we are talking about two variables which have to be multiplied together, so we are talking about a 1 in 30 chance that Doorman and Oswald
would both be wearing shirts that were both unbuttoned and loose-fitting. (10 x 3 = 30)
Then there is the v-neck t-shirt. Round-neck t-shirts, also called crew-neck, have always been more popular and still are, but v-neck users are
gaining. Recent industry reports show that 67% of t-shirt sales have been crew-neck. Then came sleeveless tanks at 17%, and then v-necks at 16%. That
last figure was probably much lower in 1963, but let's go with it. So, we'll say 1 in 6 odds of both wearing v-neck t-shirts. Multiplying that out,
we are now at 1 in 180 (30 x 6).
In other words, the odds that both Oswald and another man who was the Doorway Man both would have worn unbuttoned, loose-fitting outer shirts over
v-neck t-shirts were no greater than 1 in 180. Note also that in every picture we have of Lovelady, he is wearing a crew-neck t-shirt.
So, at first glance we are looking at odds of 180 to 1 against the apparent likenesses in dress between Oswald and Doorway Man happening by chance.
But then, when we factor in the matching collars and lapels, it takes it off the chart. The odds of that are too small to calculate. They are
infinitesmal. The right collars of Oswald and Doorman match PERFECTLY, as I demonstrate in my videos. And although we cannot see the left collar of
Doorman, (because they covered it up with that phony, ridiculous Black Tie Man) we can see the long left lapel on Doorman, which matches the one on
Oswald. Again, that puts it off the chart. How many shirts even have lapels?
Note that all this would be true even if Doorman could be ANYBODY. It would be true even Doorman could be a random guy who just happened to be walking
by and stopped. But, in this case, it's not that Doorman could be just anybody. If he's not Oswald, then he can only be one other person on the face
of the Earth: Billy Lovelady. We would have to assume that one particular individual just happened to dress himself and arrange himself that day in
the exact same manner as Lee Harvey Oswald.
Mathematically speaking, the odds that Oswald and Doorman are the same person are extremely great. And if you don't think so, I sure wish you would
sit down and play some poker with me. And let's make it high stakes.
The Doorman was Oswald, and the likenesses to Lovelady were faked. I'd go all-in on that bet.
A 48 year old state lie is dying. Let's put it out of its misery.