Originally posted by spooky24
Despite some good work done in his book Assassination Science Jim Fetzer lost all respect for his ridiculous statements about 9/11 including his
musings that the FBI planted bodies and plane wreckage outside the Pentagon. Saying that the wreckage was from plane crashes 5 years prior and the FBI
stored all this in anticipation of the big hoax is just silly and while it may please his 9/11 truth buddies he lost all respect within the research
community-and he is simply ignored by the mainstream of researchers and investigators.
The Oswald/Lovelady discussion, while interesting, has little bearing on the case as a whole. All sides of the discussion agree that LHO's statements
about being in the 2nd floor lunchroom at 12:15, as witnessed by Carolyn Arnold, are not deceptive since he was making statements that turned out to
be true in the interview with Chief Curry. Page 58 of the HSCA final report is still the accepted explanation of the similarities of the 2 men however
this is still open for discussion.
James Douglass's book "JFK and the Unspeakable" is an excellent, well researched book. That being said Jack Kennedy was notoriously closed lipped
about his thinking, and confided his real intentions only to his brother Bobby. Mr Douglass's contention that he, and only he, knows the real truth
about the Presidents Vietnam policy is flawed. There is plenty of conflicting evidence that John Kennedy was going to expand America's involvement in
The statement "He chose peace. They marked him for murder" does not fit the profile of a man who had so many issues telling the truth in both his
private and personal life-let alone his inability to react to situations only when the political ramifications were in his favor.
Your last sentence makes no sense. So what if a man keeps his affairs with other women private. That's his business, not yours, and has NOTHING to do
with him wanting peace rather than war. JFK's actions pointed toward peace. He averted the Cuban Missile Crisis, stopped the Bay of Pigs Invasion, and
was planning to withdraw from Vietnam. He had no motive to start an unnecessary war in Vietnam and was not hungry for bloodshed. Stop trying to
obfuscate things. If Kennedy had planned to escalate the Vietnam War, then the conspirators would have had no reason to assassinate him. The reason
his policies toward Vietnam seemed conflicting was because he had to play along with the military industrial complex in order to buy time to
eventually pull out of the war.
As to your statements about Fetzer's claim about the planted debris at the Pentagon, I checked with him and he said that you have your head where the
Sun does not shine. The most prominent piece of airplane debris at the Pentagon appears to have been stripped from the fuselage of a 757, showing no
signs of having been involved in a violent crash or of having been exposed to an intense fire. It also has a significant piece of vine snared in the
James Hanson, an attorney from Columbus, OH, traced this piece of fuselage back to a crash in Cali, Columbia, in 1995. Few 757s crash and this one is
the only one that fits the evidence. Since Jim has explained this in many places, he believes that one of you has discredited themselves but it's not
him. The only body part he thinks you could be talking about relates to John Judge.
John Judge has claimed that a stewardess of his acquaintance was allowed into the Pentagon and saw a piece of hand/arm of another stewardess friend of
hers, who was wearing a distinctive piece of jewelry (a bracelet, as he recalls). But there is no evidence that any plane hit the building, so if
there was a body part from the plane vs. personnel in the building, it has to have been planted.
To see how grotesquely you've distorted Fetzer's position, check out these links:
"Seven Questions about 9/11"
"What didn't happen at the Pentagon"
"The 'official account' of the 9/11 Pentagon attack is a fantasy"
For those who want more about framing Oswald for a crime he did not commit, see:
"Framing the Patsy: The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald" (with Jim Marrs)
"The JFK War: The Challenging Case of Robert Groden"
"JFK Part 1: A National Security Event - Oswald didn't do it"
“JFK Part 2: A National Security Event – How it was done”
The proof that Oswald was in the doorway is abundant and compelling. Look at the evidence.
edit on 25-7-2013 by Eurofile007 because: (no reason given)