Originally posted by apodictic
reply to post by Observor
You're coming off as hostile and immature.
Clear your attitude and I might be willing to actually carry on this conversation.
Not that carrying a conversation is what your motives are, is it?
That is kind of funny, you telling me what I have to do to continue a conversation with you. What makes you think you are so important to me?
Sorry, he's being extremely passive aggressive. He's not "anti-war" but anti-American, and I can see where he's trying to lead the conversation, whether it's intentional or not. Most likely he's choosing to reply to my post because he sees I am American military, which he automatically assumes I'm pro war and pro US government.
You got that right, I am not "anti-war" . I am anti-psychopaths and since the US is a nation of psychopaths, you wouldn't be wrong for describing me as "anti-American" either, at least for the now.
Until now, I didn't know you were military. I respond to posts and their content and not persons. Here, on this forum, I never bothered to track individual posters and their preferences or behaviours let alone their personal details like profession.
I do not agree with the Iran war, but # happens. It's the nature of the beast. Humans are violent by nature. If Iran fires the first shot, we will be defending ourselves.
The US is not even within the firing distance of Iran. So how could Iran possibly fire a first shot against US, unless of course, you station your weapony and manpower within an attacking distance of Iran in the first place? Nice way to "defend" yourselves, I should say.
There is no war unless both sides are willing to fight. No one is in the right.
Right! If someone comes armed to your house to rob you and you resist and indulge in a fight, no one would be in the right.