It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

if the 2012 presidential election was tomorrow, who would you vote for?

page: 3
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by rubbertramp
 


Rubbertramp is right. Obama signed NDAA because he supports the indefinite detention of lawful civilians. If he didn't, then he wouldn't have signed it. The ONLY other option is that he didn't read the legislation in which would made him unfit for the presidency regardless.




posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:39 PM
link   
reply to post by rubbertramp
 


And you should expect nothing less here on ATS.

The Ron Paul supporters are currently out in full force here on ATS and I noticed some time ago that a great many of the Obama supporters have either left or decided to quit wasting their time replying to political threads. I would expect nothing less than a runaway by Ron Paul here on ATS but I wouldn't expect the same results in a national election. Sorry but I don't even see him getting nominated by his own party, much less elected as POTUS.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 08:48 PM
link   


And you should expect nothing less here on ATS. The Ron Paul supporters are currently out in full force here on ATS and I noticed some time ago that a great many of the Obama supporters have either left or decided to quit wasting their time replying to political threads. I would expect nothing less than a runaway by Ron Paul here on ATS but I wouldn't expect the same results in a national election. Sorry but I don't even see him getting nominated by his own party, much less elected as POTUS.


I don't understand the complaint here. You are perfectly entitled to your* opinion but you and Ike volunteered more information than necessary. So when the people on this forum, me included, ask you how do you justify your opinion given the action of the administration and verbal evidence by Carl Levin, you go on to complain the ATS is overrun by Paul fans?

edit on 4-1-2012 by Blurps because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 09:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Blurps
 


I was not complaining about this site being overrun by Ron Paul fans. I was just responding to his observation that Ron Paul was running away with this poll, nothing more.

Regarding the statements made by Senator Levin, I was just watching it on Youtube and have not yet verified if what he says is indeed factual and if so, who in the Obama administration pushed for the change. All I know is that it doesn't make much sense to push for legislation and then issue signing statements that advocate against it. I'm still checking it out and I thank you for bringing it to my attention.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blurps



And you should expect nothing less here on ATS. The Ron Paul supporters are currently out in full force here on ATS and I noticed some time ago that a great many of the Obama supporters have either left or decided to quit wasting their time replying to political threads. I would expect nothing less than a runaway by Ron Paul here on ATS but I wouldn't expect the same results in a national election. Sorry but I don't even see him getting nominated by his own party, much less elected as POTUS.


I don't understand the complaint here. You are perfectly entitled to your* opinion but you and Ike volunteered more information than necessary. So when the people on this forum, me included, ask you how do you justify your opinion given the action of the administration and verbal evidence by Carl Levin, you go on to complain the ATS is overrun by Paul fans?

edit on 4-1-2012 by Blurps because: (no reason given)


i knew it would go this way, mostly because the paul supporters are much more vocal than others right now.
more power to them, this is what makes freedom of speech worth fighting for.
i keep my opinion out of it, whether i agree is a different story.
i voted for gary johnson, i like paul, but don't think he has much of a chance, neither does johnson, but i like the guy and find him less controversial.



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Ron Paul. But you knew that, right?



posted on Jan, 4 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   
Huntsman



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hanslune
Huntsman


Yes Huntsman needs more support!!!! Now is the time to surge. Hope he can pull off a Santorum!. I guess that's a catch phrase now. I've been hearing it a lot in the news lately.



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Obama.



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:19 AM
link   
Ron Paul

wish i could vote for him in Canada



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:25 AM
link   
Kucinich or Sanders



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 02:34 AM
link   
So far, none of the above is my choice.

There isn't one person I trust. I never thought that Obama would change much if anything. I didn't vote for him last time and won't this time either.

However, the Republicans have an even worse range of picks. I don't trust Ron Paul either, and find some of his positions too radically pro-corporation to stomach.

So perhaps the Green candidate, or the Libertarian.

Perhaps a write-in.

At this point, who knows? All I really know is that so far, "none of the above" has my solid vote.



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 03:46 AM
link   
Obama



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 06:47 AM
link   
Obama without a second's hesitation.



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 07:09 AM
link   
my vote was with Ron Paul but since he announced his run today Im down for Cobra Commander :

www.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 07:22 AM
link   
Ron Paul

And, I'm a real life person on the internet. I will be at the polls on primary day and in November in person.



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 08:33 AM
link   

if the 2012 presidential election was tomorrow, who would you vote for?,

None of the above. I'd vote if Jon Huntsman or Bill Richardson were in the running. I'd consider Bobby Jindal. Maybe. But Obama? No way. Romney or Newt? Nope. Ron Paul? It would have to depend on who his VP was. Otherwise .. if it were today ... I'd be voting 'none of the above'. (in other words, probably not voting).



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 08:36 AM
link   
Batman! The only safe choice.

However, I'm glad the election isn't today, because one good thing that will come out of this long stretch is that most candidates (present POTUS included) will start adopting (stealing) the other's good ideas.

Obama has just release his "reducing the military" strategy after seeing Paul's success with it. Now if only all the candidates promised to get rid of the Fed Reserve I'd think about someone other than batman....



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 09:16 AM
link   
paul- 16
nobody- 3
gary johnson- 1
obama- 4
sanders- 3
huntsman- 4
batman- 1

p.s., those mentioning more than one will have their vote added to an already existing candidate,



posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 09:20 AM
link   
Ron Paul

because it would amuse me.. and i already gave him 25 dollars... might as well vote for him too.


but the truth is.. i dont vote.. for the same reason i no longer write letters to santa claus
edit on 5-1-2012 by BohemianBrim because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join