It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Amaterasu
Thanks - looks like new age woo to me.
2nd
Originally posted by Amaterasu
reply to post by 46ACE
[shrug] Make of it what You will.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Amaterasu
Thanks - looks like new age woo to me.
2nd
Sorry You're not aware of the existence of electrogravitics in black ops. (I am, however.) Sorry You're not aware of subquantum kinetics. Sorry You're not aware of the efforts of the power elite to maintain Einsteinian physics so as to hide the fact that We can extract abundant free energy. Sorry You're not aware of the fact that "Maxwell's equations" are really Heaviside truncations of Maxwell's quaternions which throw out fully half of what Maxwell described.
If You were aware...it wouldn't sound like "new age woo" to You. But You're welcome to Your ignorance.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Amaterasu
Thanks - looks like new age woo to me.
2nd
Sorry You're not aware of the existence of electrogravitics in black ops. (I am, however.) Sorry You're not aware of subquantum kinetics. Sorry You're not aware of the efforts of the power elite to maintain Einsteinian physics so as to hide the fact that We can extract abundant free energy. Sorry You're not aware of the fact that "Maxwell's equations" are really Heaviside truncations of Maxwell's quaternions which throw out fully half of what Maxwell described.
If You were aware...it wouldn't sound like "new age woo" to You. But You're welcome to Your ignorance.
“Maxwell’s” vector equations taught in university are actually Heaviside’s truncated equations, and are only a simplified version of what Maxwell originally wrote.
The Maxwell-Heaviside theory of electrodynamics is now well over a century old, and is actually a serious truncation of Maxwell's 1865 theory of 20 equations in 20 unknowns (those are specifically listed in the original published paper in 1865). Because it was “tainted” with a higher group symmetry algebra (quaternions), even Maxwell himself came under intense pressure to simplify it, after the publication of the first edition of his famous Treatise in 1873. Consequently, Maxwell was rewriting and greatly “watering down” his own Treatise, having finished rewriting and greatly reducing some 80% of it at the time of his death in 1879. The second edition and third edition, therefore, are NOT the original Maxwellian theory, but a very serious truncation.
Thomas Bearden
Bearden has little formal training in physics and one analysis of these theories describes them as "full of misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning the theory of the electromagnetic field".[10] At his website and in correspondence, Bearden identifies himself as "PhD"[11] and claims he received a doctorate for "life experience and for life accomplishment".[12] The Skeptical Inquirer, among others, revealed that he purchased his Ph.D. from Trinity College and University, which the magazine describes as "a British institution with no building, campus, faculty, or president, and run from a post office box in Sioux Falls, South Dakota".[13]
Hyperdimensional physics
Hoagland has proposed a form of physics he calls 'hyperdimensional physics'[22][23] which, supported by the work of pseudoscientific overunity claimant Thomas E. Bearden,[24] he claims to represent the full implementation of James Clerk Maxwell's original 20 quaternion equations,[25] instead of the reduced Maxwell's equations as amended by Oliver Heaviside commonly taught today. These ideas are rejected by the mainstream physics community as unfounded.
Originally posted by Aliensun
reply to post by jensy
How can anybody be intensely interested in super aircraft, space planes, etc. and not at some point give serious thought to why the government never developed a replacement for the shuttle? Why would we leave our ISS high and dry (supposedly)?
Originally posted by Mkoll
This is completely ridiculous and unnecessary. With the state of America as it is and the fact that the raptor is completely unmatched this is just a total waste of taxpayer money. And to think I was watching the Futureweapons episode on the F-22 Raptor today
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Sorry You're not aware of the existence of electrogravitics in black ops. (I am, however.) Sorry You're not aware of subquantum kinetics. Sorry You're not aware of the efforts of the power elite to maintain Einsteinian physics so as to hide the fact that We can extract abundant free energy. Sorry You're not aware of the fact that "Maxwell's equations" are really Heaviside truncations of Maxwell's quaternions which throw out fully half of what Maxwell described.
If You were aware...it wouldn't sound like "new age woo" to You. But You're welcome to Your ignorance.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by GAOTU789
Yeah the F-35 is a bit of a white elephant.
Australia is supposed to take delivery of 14 Lightning II's in 2014, we're already looking for another option because of the budget and delivery blowouts...
I've read Israel are doing the same.
edit on 4/1/12 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by StratosFear
I figured the next one would be a drone of some sort but thank god someone one the design team still remembers this is America and if you at least have a powerplant, wings, wheels and a seat some crazy bastards going to want to ride it
Any idea what the name is?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Thanks you so much - I am happy to be aware that I do not know stuff - rather than believe some carp invented argumentum ex culo to bolster my sense of importance with fantasy stories!!
The common Chewbacca Defense is based on the following misconceptions and/or fallacies:
If you can prove the other side wrong, it makes you right.
If you can word your statements and arguments in a way that is too confusing, intelligent-sounding, or nonsensical for the opponent to respond to, it makes them wrong and it makes you right.
If you can shock or confuse your opponent and make them think you are a lost cause and not worth arguing with, you are right.
If you can make an opponent look bad, their logic must be equally bad, and therefore you are right.
If your opponent is stumped at giving you a straight-forward answer or rebuttal to your point.
If you are more popular than your opponent, it makes them wrong and it makes you right.
If you just keep arguing and shouting, even if everyone else (not just everyone else in the debate — everyone else in the world) thinks you are not just wrong, but insane, until everyone else just gets tired of listening to you spew nonsense, you're the last man standing, and, by default, you are right.
I agree Ucavs are the future.. they can manuever more violently ( higher g's)without worying about the pilot( 9 "g"s max?)
Originally posted by SJE98
Why this design from Lockheed ? A flying wing can take more stress across the air frame ,fly faster and maneuver better If you take the driver out of the equation. thus the future is unmanned flight. I would write the equation(s) but don't have the symbols on my keyboard. Say, anyone know of a good program that does that. the last one I had was not up to par. I hear Grumman has been busy with 4 or 5 different prototypes. Maybe this is why Lockheed is putting out a drawing. Anyway we don't not have the cash for any new fighter. Lockheed needs to concentrate on the version at hand.
Everyone is getting a stealth these days. I don't think we can even afford a fleet of these, lol
Horton 229 V3 , RC impressive.
edit on 12-1-2012 by SJE98 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BRAVO949
Israel is not afraid of signing on to very expensive military equipment programs.
Mainly because the American taxpayer has been signed onto a loan from China to pay for whatever Israel gets.
In general - the problem is Israel.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Look, My father, an electrical engineer, said We have this tech and that He was successfully testing it. Believe as You wish, love. I know better.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Originally posted by Amaterasu
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Look, My father, an electrical engineer, said We have this tech and that He was successfully testing it. Believe as You wish, love. I know better.
Oh, he's an electrical engineer is he? Fair enough, that makes the most ludicrous claims perfectly acceptable at nothing more than face value.