posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 05:57 AM
reply to post by Arken
Your LROC images proves nothing. Oh, yes, proves that even the LROC images are heavily manipulated to hide!
Could you please show that? Seriously. Using whatever technique you want, then post it in here to show beyond doubt that it's been messed with to
cover something up. Please.
At 200 - 300 feet, that land mark is actually shorter than Khufu's pyramid in Egypt. Unless you are also saying we can not believe the elevation data
on Google Earth.
See, we are at a impasse I'm afraid. You show a blurry, non-detailed photo, from older missions, and say it shows something that is artificial, and
not natural. Then when you are shown the latest and greatest pictures of the same place, using newer technology, you say that we can't believe it,
that it's been covered up, but do not provide proof of this (proof being showing how that LROC picture had been manipulated to look the way it does.
NOT repost your older, blurry photo).
I'm a skeptic, but not a denier. Which means I'm willing to look at anything that someone presents. But if I find that the evidence they show is
lacking, or they are using older photos when new data of that same area is available, I'm going to question what they presented. Not blindly
That said, when the presenter then discounts high resolution pictures that were most recently taken, claiming that they have been manipulated to
"cover up the truth", yet does not provide evident that they were manipulated, but instead blindly believes that anything NASA shows has been
manipulated on word alone (which is VERY ironic, considered that the older pictures would have been a LOT more easy to manipulate since their
resolution is so low), then we are stuck at a impasse.
The only thing that will help at this point would be: for you to build your own probe to send to the moon to take pictures of that area. Have the
probe transmit on a open frequency with a non-encrypted code, so that anyone can receive it and translate it's down stream into pictures.