posted on Jan, 5 2012 @ 05:12 AM
reply to post by candcantiques
My personal view is that Abraham was not an individual but that's another discussion maybe?
The problem I have with your post is that it is self-contradicting the argument in the OP.
If you agree with Santorum's view in the OP then it is also true that you agree with the concept of conquest? Past, Present or Future?
Israel existed in the past, yes! I agree with that. Was it still Israel up to 1948? No, I disagree, however it also depends on so many different
points of view over so many years. What are we looking for? Something official? From whom? Who decided in the end? Is it fair to all parties? Never!
What about all the other countries in history that have constantly changed names and cultures which is really just human history? No?
In the end supporting this Santorum video is accepting that another country at some time in the future could take over and call it something else is
really the message I heard. But that is just my humble opinion.