New Hampshire Primary, January 10

cnn.com has a nice updater on its main page.

Don't give CNN your views/clicks.

Google has results too:
www.google.com...


Or go with CSPAN.

Originally posted by eLPresidente
Don't give CNN your views/clicks.

Google has results too:
www.google.com...


Or go with CSPAN.

Touche, thanks.

I hope Mitt looses his lead somewhat, its obvious that he was going to win NH but I hope he wins by under 10%

Is this the thread for the New Hampshire primary which members will use for rapid fire updates or is there another thread? Add link if there is a different one please.

4 of 301 precincts - 1 percent

Mitt Romney 859 - 35 percent
Ron Paul 652 - 27 percent
Jon Huntsman 342 - 14 percent
Newt Gingrich 266 - 11 percent
Rick Santorum 264 - 11 percent
Total Write-ins 13 - 1 percent

Originally posted by monkofmimir
I hope Mitt looses his lead somewhat, its obvious that he was going to win NH but I hope he wins by under 10%

Realistically he will hope to win by at least 30 points. Anything less than that will be a failure (although he won't admit that, of course).

reply to post by capone1


CNN is guilty of manipulation of actual news, polls, surged Santorum and pushing Huntsman in NH.

Hopefully, we don't entertain the troll too much on this thread.
Very early results show Romney, of course. The fact that Paul can get this many votes, in a corrupt political/media circus, is phenomenal.
There is no shame in second when the winner has already been decided.

Nevermind...

11 of 301 precincts - 4 percent

Mitt Romney 4,380 - 37 percent
Ron Paul 2,859 - 24 percent
Jon Huntsman 1,724 - 15 percent
Newt Gingrich 1,387 - 12 percent
Rick Santorum 1,221 - 10 percent
Rick Perry 73 - 1 percent
Total Write-ins 60 - 1 percent

reply to post by SurrealisticPillow


Good thought:

We are doing well considering:

Some of Romney's top funders: Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan & Chase Co., Credit Suisse, Citi

The bulk of Ron's donors are: average joe's, middle class.

Media and establishment is against Ron Paul

We are winning the long haul ideological war even though we lose some physical battles.



Imagine what the 2016 elections are going to look like.

It's amazing to me that this time in 2008 Paul was fifth with only 8%.

It takes being beaten over the head for years but eventually people, some people, do come to their senses.

reply to post by mossme89


You want to win, not because your opponent lost, but because you actually won. There is no honor in winning a battle against an opponent in a sword fight who has only one leg and one arm, just as it is without honor to wish a win in a battle such as this one based upon Romney’s corruption.

Note: This is coming from someone who is neutral towards Paul.

Originally posted by mossme89
This might sound terrible, but I really hope something condemning comes out about Mitt Romney. There has to be something...

That sounds bitter and desperate. I suspect it's not the attitude Ron Paul would want you to take...

reply to post by FOXMULDER147


Probably not. But we need Paul to get into office.

Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow

 

Imagine what the 2016 elections are going to look like.

edit on 10-1-2012 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)

if there is still a usa and it still has elections by 2016, these days I'm starting to wonder

Originally posted by mossme89
reply to post by FOXMULDER147

 

Probably not. But we need Paul to get into office.

Well, Paul's doing well in Manchester. 24% after 75% reporting...

If we can get out of N.H. with
Romney 35
Paul 25
Huntsman 15.
We win. (Paul supporters that is).
Gingrich has money to hang around. I suspect he will hope to have the clout to get the V.P. slot, by vote and wallet.

15 of 301 precincts - 5 percent

Mitt Romney 5,325 - 36 percent
Ron Paul 3,651 - 25 percent
Jon Huntsman 2,167 - 15 percent
Newt Gingrich 1,675 - 11 percent
Rick Santorum 1,472 - 10 percent
Rick Perry 98 - 1 percent
Total Write-ins 67 - 0 percent