Hey Jim,
It really comes down to how one defines 'battle' and given the fact that somewhere around one quarter million South Vietnamese, fifty odd thousand
American soldiers, five thousand South Koreans and thirty Laotians the question is how much fighting the US must not have been involved in to avoid
suffering the attrition suffered by the South Vietnamese forces. Fact is just like in Iraq and Afghanistan the US is not doing the majority of the
patrols and actual fighting and can therefore pick where to apply most damage with least attrition and consequently no chance of 'losing' the size
battles me or you would notice. The last time the US were involved in a stand up fight against a similarly armed&organized enemy was back in Korea
and given the record there we thus all know that American soldiers are human and will retreat like any other when debilitating pressure is applied or
when strategic/tactical necessity dictates that they do. Giving up the 'battle/battlefield' only says so much and there is no need to be very so
very sensitive about it!
Originally posted by JIMC5499
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Actually we did win every battle in Vietnam and no we didn't go head to head with either Russia or China. If we wouldn't have restricted ourselves
so much with our Rules of Engagement that war wouldn't have lasted six months.
Also the notion that the war against South Vietnam ( it was a counter insurgency war) could be won in 6 months by the expedient of destroying the
country you were trying to 'protect' makes little sense and what destruction they did in fact wreak on South, and later North Korea, did not in my
opinion ultimately win the war as much as simply sticking around and escalating it slowly did. Remember this was a time when reinforcing the east
meant weakening Europe and perhaps inviting Chinese intervention in Vietnam, as in Korea, or worse, Russian Intervention in central Europe... As i
understand it the US escalated the conflict in Vietnam about as quickly as it safely could while keeping the balance of it's forces in the ETO.
As for CVN top speeds nothing even remotely official claims more than 35 with normal design speeds stated at 30 -33 depending on class..
www.navweaps.com...
Mind you 60 Km/ph at sea is FAST and given the size of these things it must feel much more impressive onboard than watching...
Thats all i have to bother you with for now,